Evolution proves that algorithms can solve any problem: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|devil|}}You will see much scepticism in these pages that the claims advanced artificial intelligence are all they have cracked up to be. This is not just predicated on..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}You will see much scepticism in these pages that the claims advanced [[artificial intelligence]] are all they have cracked up to be. This is not just predicated on the quality of [[LinkedIn]]’s AI]]-generated question prompts, although they are certainly articulate evidence for the defence. | {{a|devil| | ||
[[File:AI Comments.png|450px|thumb|center|Some intelligent [[chatbot]]s, yesterday.]] | |||
}}You will see much scepticism in these pages that the claims advanced [[artificial intelligence]] are all they have cracked up to be. This is not just predicated on the quality of [[LinkedIn]]’s [[AI]]-generated question prompts, although they are certainly articulate evidence for the defence. | |||
We say that algorithmic processes — even clever ones — are simply ''incapable'' of responding to unexpected events in [[complex system]]s. These require imagination, creativity, and an ability to construct a narrative — qualities not possessed by any [[artificial intelligence]] known to the world today. Expecting preconfigured algorithms to solve novel problems is like expecting Newtonian mechanics to solve problems which, by their existence, [[falsify]] Newtonian mechanics. One needs to construct an entirely new model. | We say that algorithmic processes — even clever ones — are simply ''incapable'' of responding to unexpected events in [[complex system]]s. These require imagination, creativity, and an ability to construct a narrative — qualities not possessed by any [[artificial intelligence]] known to the world today. Expecting preconfigured algorithms to solve novel problems is like expecting Newtonian mechanics to solve problems which, by their existence, [[falsify]] Newtonian mechanics. One needs to construct an entirely new model. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
Aha, but the very imagination, creativity and narrative construction skills you point to are themselves the product of an algorithm: the algorithm encoded into [[evolution by natural selection]]. | Aha, but the very imagination, creativity and narrative construction skills you point to are themselves the product of an algorithm: the algorithm encoded into [[evolution by natural selection]]. | ||
Here they might appeal to {{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}: it was [[evolution by natural selection]], after all, and ''only'' [[evolution by natural selection]] that operated 370 million years | Here they might appeal to {{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}: it was [[evolution by natural selection]], after all, and ''only'' [[evolution by natural selection]] that as operated relentlessly, fpr 370 million years since the first legged fish when they crawled out of the primordial ooze and onto the shores of a new, terrestrial world. That single algorithm transformed those little flippy-finned mudsuckers into the highest type of sentient being yet known in this neighbourhood of the Galaxy: the [[ISDA ninja]]. ''So how can you say [[algorithm]]s can’t be intelligent?'' | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 1 September 2020
|
You will see much scepticism in these pages that the claims advanced artificial intelligence are all they have cracked up to be. This is not just predicated on the quality of LinkedIn’s AI-generated question prompts, although they are certainly articulate evidence for the defence.
We say that algorithmic processes — even clever ones — are simply incapable of responding to unexpected events in complex systems. These require imagination, creativity, and an ability to construct a narrative — qualities not possessed by any artificial intelligence known to the world today. Expecting preconfigured algorithms to solve novel problems is like expecting Newtonian mechanics to solve problems which, by their existence, falsify Newtonian mechanics. One needs to construct an entirely new model.
Here is the prosecution’s clincher.
Aha, but the very imagination, creativity and narrative construction skills you point to are themselves the product of an algorithm: the algorithm encoded into evolution by natural selection.
Here they might appeal to Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: it was evolution by natural selection, after all, and only evolution by natural selection that as operated relentlessly, fpr 370 million years since the first legged fish when they crawled out of the primordial ooze and onto the shores of a new, terrestrial world. That single algorithm transformed those little flippy-finned mudsuckers into the highest type of sentient being yet known in this neighbourhood of the Galaxy: the ISDA ninja. So how can you say algorithms can’t be intelligent?