Go: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}A complicated system that is so hard to brute-force solve  — and I mean a ''lot'' harder than draughts or [[chess]], that it is, in {{author|Daniel Susskind}}’s mind, compelling evidence that we will shortly be good for [[Technological unemployment|little more than pleasant intellectual onanism]] while the machines harvest our vital fluids for battery juice and wage wars on each other above ground in a post-apocalyptic waste-land.
{{a|devil|}}A complicated system that is so hard to brute-force solve  — and I mean a ''lot'' harder than draughts or [[chess]], that it is, in {{author|Daniel Susskind}}’s mind, compelling evidence that we will shortly be good for [[Technological unemployment|little more than pleasant intellectual onanism]] while the machines harvest our vital fluids for battery juice and wage wars on each other above ground in a post-apocalyptic waste-land.
{{sa}}
*[[Chess]]
*[[Systems analysis]]
*[[Rumours of our demise are greatly exaggerated]]
*{{br|A World Without Work}}

Revision as of 13:41, 25 October 2020

In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A complicated system that is so hard to brute-force solve — and I mean a lot harder than draughts or chess, that it is, in Daniel Susskind’s mind, compelling evidence that we will shortly be good for little more than pleasant intellectual onanism while the machines harvest our vital fluids for battery juice and wage wars on each other above ground in a post-apocalyptic waste-land.

See also