High modernism: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|design|}}As {{author|James C. Scott}} articulates it in {{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}}, a muscle-bound self-confidence in expansion of production; our growing ability to satisfy human needs and master nature (including human nature) “and, above all, the rational design of social order commensurate with the scientific understanding of natural laws”. | {{a|design|}}As {{author|James C. Scott}} articulates it in {{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}}, a muscle-bound self-confidence in expansion of production; our growing ability to satisfy human needs and master nature (including human nature) “and, above all, the rational design of social order commensurate with the scientific understanding of natural laws”. | ||
It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence | It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence “[[legible]]”) view of the word and depends on central state vision to bring about big projects (enormous infrastructure projects, genocidal agricultural programmes, [[banner IT project]]s and so on). | ||
Once you see it you cannot unsee it. High-modernism — “physics envy”, in {{author|Paul Ormerod}}’s words — is rife in [[financial services]], and particularly in reg tech, since the ''only'' word a reg tech application can hope to solve is a modernist one populated with rationalists. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}} | *{{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}} | ||
*[[Legibility]] | *[[Legibility]] | ||
Revision as of 12:25, 16 January 2021
|
The design of organisations and products
|
As James C. Scott articulates it in Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, a muscle-bound self-confidence in expansion of production; our growing ability to satisfy human needs and master nature (including human nature) “and, above all, the rational design of social order commensurate with the scientific understanding of natural laws”.
It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence “legible”) view of the word and depends on central state vision to bring about big projects (enormous infrastructure projects, genocidal agricultural programmes, banner IT projects and so on).
Once you see it you cannot unsee it. High-modernism — “physics envy”, in Paul Ormerod’s words — is rife in financial services, and particularly in reg tech, since the only word a reg tech application can hope to solve is a modernist one populated with rationalists.