High modernism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|design|}}As {{author|James C. Scott}} articulates it in {{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}}, a | {{a|design|}}As {{author|James C. Scott}} articulates it in {{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}}, a “muscle-bound” self-confidence in the expansion of production; our growing ability to satisfy human needs and master nature (including human nature) “and, above all, the rational design of social order commensurate with the scientific understanding of natural laws”. | ||
It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence “[[legible]]”) view of the word and depends on central state vision to bring about big projects (enormous infrastructure projects, genocidal agricultural programmes, [[banner IT project]]s and so on). | It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence “[[legible]]”) view of the word and depends on central state vision to bring about big projects (enormous infrastructure projects, genocidal agricultural programmes, [[banner IT project]]s and so on). | ||
Once you see it you cannot unsee it. High-modernism — “physics envy”, in {{author|Paul Ormerod}}’s words — is rife in [[financial services]], and particularly in reg tech, since the ''only'' word a reg tech application can hope to solve is a modernist one populated with rationalists. | To be contrasted with “[[metis]]”: the local expert applying knowhow, folk knowledge, experience to deal with situations on the ground when you see them. The high-modernists inhabit your management layers and the management consultancy profession. “[[Metis]]” is possessed by our old friend, the [[subject matter expert]]. | ||
Once you see it you cannot unsee it. High-modernism — “physics envy”, in {{author|Paul Ormerod}}’s words — is rife in [[financial services]], and particularly in reg tech, since the ''only'' word a [[reg tech]] application can hope to solve is a modernist one populated with rationalists. | |||
===The JC’s cricket [[metaphor]]=== | |||
Here’s how the [[JC]] sees how the high modernist and the local expert, respectively, would handle the job of catching a cricket ball: | |||
*'''High modernist''': The high modernist would gather all the available data: ball speed, vector etc, run it through the necessary equations<ref>[https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-physics/chapter/projectile-motion/ here], should you be interested.</ref> to calculate the ball’s trajectory, to determine exactly where and when the ball will land, and will deploy the cheapest possible unit (a contractor supplied by an alternative catching services provider in [[School-leaver from Bucharest|Bucharest]] with [[service level agreement]] to arrive at those coordinates — within a guaranteed delivery window of an hour — to collect the ball which, unless your [[SLA]] specifies must be retrieved on an expedited, “in mid-air”, basis will be retrieved from the ground (there being a premium service available — with an attendant administration fee payable — for “best efforts” mid-air, just in time retrieval). It will turn out that, in fact, there is hearty [[force majeure]] clause, wherein wind counts unquestionably as an [[act of God]] — well, it is, right? — which, if wind or humidity conditions shift the ball’s trajectory in any direction by a “material” degree the service provider’s liability will be discharged. It turns out the contractor considers “an inch” a material alternation. | |||
*'''[[Subject matter expert]]''': The subject matter expert, who has played a lot of cricket, will watch the ball, and run around to catch it. Having played a lot of cricket we can safely assume she quite ''likes'' cricket, and will be happy for the opportunity of a game. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}} | *{{br|Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed}} | ||
*[[Legibility]] | *[[Legibility]] | ||
{{Ref}} | |||
Revision as of 19:46, 17 January 2021
|
The design of organisations and products
|
As James C. Scott articulates it in Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, a “muscle-bound” self-confidence in the expansion of production; our growing ability to satisfy human needs and master nature (including human nature) “and, above all, the rational design of social order commensurate with the scientific understanding of natural laws”.
It translates to a rational, ordered, geometric (hence “legible”) view of the word and depends on central state vision to bring about big projects (enormous infrastructure projects, genocidal agricultural programmes, banner IT projects and so on).
To be contrasted with “metis”: the local expert applying knowhow, folk knowledge, experience to deal with situations on the ground when you see them. The high-modernists inhabit your management layers and the management consultancy profession. “Metis” is possessed by our old friend, the subject matter expert.
Once you see it you cannot unsee it. High-modernism — “physics envy”, in Paul Ormerod’s words — is rife in financial services, and particularly in reg tech, since the only word a reg tech application can hope to solve is a modernist one populated with rationalists.
The JC’s cricket metaphor
Here’s how the JC sees how the high modernist and the local expert, respectively, would handle the job of catching a cricket ball:
- High modernist: The high modernist would gather all the available data: ball speed, vector etc, run it through the necessary equations[1] to calculate the ball’s trajectory, to determine exactly where and when the ball will land, and will deploy the cheapest possible unit (a contractor supplied by an alternative catching services provider in Bucharest with service level agreement to arrive at those coordinates — within a guaranteed delivery window of an hour — to collect the ball which, unless your SLA specifies must be retrieved on an expedited, “in mid-air”, basis will be retrieved from the ground (there being a premium service available — with an attendant administration fee payable — for “best efforts” mid-air, just in time retrieval). It will turn out that, in fact, there is hearty force majeure clause, wherein wind counts unquestionably as an act of God — well, it is, right? — which, if wind or humidity conditions shift the ball’s trajectory in any direction by a “material” degree the service provider’s liability will be discharged. It turns out the contractor considers “an inch” a material alternation.
- Subject matter expert: The subject matter expert, who has played a lot of cricket, will watch the ball, and run around to catch it. Having played a lot of cricket we can safely assume she quite likes cricket, and will be happy for the opportunity of a game.