The Death and Life of Great American Cities: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There is so much that is breathtaking about this book. That its author had neither tertiary education nor any experience in urban planning; that is was published in sixty years ago yet seems to depict uncannily the [[high-modernist]] attitudes that {{author|James C. Scott}} skewered forty years later in {{br|Seeing Like A State}}, but which seem to persist today; that its prescription, in is so counterintuitive, visionary, clear and ''brilliant'', and that it is so liberal — ''really'' liberal as opposed to [[libtard]] liberal — pluralistic and imaginative. | There is so much that is breathtaking about this book. That its author had neither tertiary education nor any experience in urban planning; that is was published in sixty years ago yet seems to depict uncannily the [[high-modernist]] attitudes that {{author|James C. Scott}} skewered forty years later in {{br|Seeing Like A State}}, but which seem to persist today; that its prescription, in is so counterintuitive, visionary, clear and ''brilliant'', and that it is so liberal — ''really'' liberal as opposed to [[libtard]] liberal — pluralistic and imaginative. | ||
It resonates with a series of other great books in adjacent fields over the last sixty years all of whom caution against executive, top-down direction networks of autonomous individuals who are better placed, motivated and incentivised to make executive decisions for themselves. Jacobs was there first, and she if she didn’t articulate [[complexity theory]], [[systems theory]] then she anticipated it with spooky, eerie accuracy. So read ''American Cities'' with {{ | It resonates with a series of other great books in adjacent fields over the last sixty years all of whom caution against executive, top-down direction networks of autonomous individuals who are better placed, motivated and incentivised to make executive decisions for themselves. Jacobs was there first, and she if she didn’t articulate [[complexity theory]], [[systems theory]] then she anticipated it with spooky, eerie accuracy. So read ''American Cities'' with {{br|Seeing Like a State}}, {{author|Charles Perrow}}’s {{br|Normal Accidents}} and {{author|Donella H. Meadows}}’ {{br|Thinking in Systems}} and you will have the bones of a grand unifying theory of everything. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{author|Charles Perrow}}’s {{br|Normal Accidents}} | |||
*{{author|Donella H. Meadows}}’ {{br|Thinking in Systems}} | |||
*[[Complexity theory]] | |||
Revision as of 20:54, 23 January 2021
|
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Jane Jacobs
Systems thinking 1960s style
There is so much that is breathtaking about this book. That its author had neither tertiary education nor any experience in urban planning; that is was published in sixty years ago yet seems to depict uncannily the high-modernist attitudes that James C. Scott skewered forty years later in Seeing Like A State, but which seem to persist today; that its prescription, in is so counterintuitive, visionary, clear and brilliant, and that it is so liberal — really liberal as opposed to libtard liberal — pluralistic and imaginative.
It resonates with a series of other great books in adjacent fields over the last sixty years all of whom caution against executive, top-down direction networks of autonomous individuals who are better placed, motivated and incentivised to make executive decisions for themselves. Jacobs was there first, and she if she didn’t articulate complexity theory, systems theory then she anticipated it with spooky, eerie accuracy. So read American Cities with Seeing Like a State, Charles Perrow’s Normal Accidents and Donella H. Meadows’ Thinking in Systems and you will have the bones of a grand unifying theory of everything.