Unknowns: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''{{risk|Known known}}''': the easy stuff; the stuff of [[service catalog|service catalogs]] and [[Risk taxonomy - Risk Article|risk taxonomies]]; | *'''{{risk|Known known}}''': the easy stuff; the stuff of [[service catalog|service catalogs]] and [[Risk taxonomy - Risk Article|risk taxonomies]]; | ||
*'''{{risk|Known unknown}}''': the stuff you know about but can’t control. | *'''{{risk|Known unknown}}''': the stuff you know about but can’t control. | ||
*'''{{risk|Unknown unknown}}''': the [[black swan]]s. This is where the risk is most acute, precisely because your risk taxonomy, with 20:20 hindsight, is ''guaranteed'' to miss these altogether. | *'''{{risk|Unknown unknown}}''': the [[black swan]]s. This is where the risk is most acute, precisely because your risk taxonomy, with 20:20 [[hindsight]], is ''guaranteed'' to miss these altogether. | ||
===The [[JC]]’s [[Unknown known|unknown known]]=== | ===The [[JC]]’s [[Unknown known|unknown known]]=== | ||
{{santayana}} | {{santayana}} | ||
Not included in [[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]] (perhaps because it doesn’t make much sense at first) is the '''{{risk|unknown known}}'''. Now, before you write this off, well — see the[[Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999]] for the sorts of things a well-ordered market can forget over sixty-odd years. The [[JC]] — who likes a pet theory, as readers will know — feels that [[unknown known]]s might be the riskiest bucket of the lot. | Not included in [[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]] (perhaps because it doesn’t make much sense at first) is the '''{{risk|unknown known}}'''. Now, before you write this off, well — see the[[Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999]] for the sorts of things a well-ordered market can forget over sixty-odd years. The [[JC]] — who likes a pet theory, as readers will know — feels that [[unknown known]]s might be the riskiest bucket of the lot. | ||
Revision as of 09:21, 2 February 2021
|
Risk Anatomy™
 There are six types of known. The Rumsfeld three:
And the Jolly Contrarian three:
|
Say what you like about the neocons, but this, from Donald Rumsfeld was a modern classic:
- Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones.
Rumsfeld’s knowns and unknowns
- Known known: the easy stuff; the stuff of service catalogs and risk taxonomies;
- Known unknown: the stuff you know about but can’t control.
- Unknown unknown: the black swans. This is where the risk is most acute, precisely because your risk taxonomy, with 20:20 hindsight, is guaranteed to miss these altogether.
The JC’s unknown known
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Not included in Rumsfeld’s taxonomy (perhaps because it doesn’t make much sense at first) is the unknown known. Now, before you write this off, well — see theFinancial Services Modernization Act of 1999 for the sorts of things a well-ordered market can forget over sixty-odd years. The JC — who likes a pet theory, as readers will know — feels that unknown knowns might be the riskiest bucket of the lot.