Guarantee: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
We should *never* agree to the guarantee of individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s (or accepting [[letter of credit|Letters of Credit]] with respect to individual transactions) under an {{isdama}}. The reason relates to the way {{isdama}}s are closed out inder Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}}: | We should *never* agree to the guarantee of individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s (or accepting [[letter of credit|Letters of Credit]] with respect to individual transactions) under an {{isdama}}. The reason relates to the way {{isdama}}s are closed out inder Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}}: | ||
{{isdaq|6(e)(i)|2002}} | {box|{{isdaq|6(e)(i)|2002}}}} | ||
*On a close-out, each {{isdaprov|Transaction}} is terminated, the individual close-out amounts are determined, they’re aggregated up to a single net sum (i.e. negative exposures are netted off against positive ones) and the single Early Termination Payment is payable under {{isdaprov|6(e)}} ({{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}) of the {{isdama}}. | *On a close-out, each {{isdaprov|Transaction}} is terminated, the individual close-out amounts are determined, they’re aggregated up to a single net sum (i.e. negative exposures are netted off against positive ones) and the single Early Termination Payment is payable under {{isdaprov|6(e)}} ({{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}) of the {{isdama}}. | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 10 May 2013
Guarantees under the ISDA Master Agreement and why a Transaction-Specific guarantee is a bad idea
Should a client request a transaction-specific parental guarantee under an ISDA Master Agreement instead of the usual “all obligations” guarantee of all obligations under the ISDA Master Agreement and all transactions under it, escalate immediately.
We should *never* agree to the guarantee of individual Transactions (or accepting Letters of Credit with respect to individual transactions) under an ISDA Master Agreement. The reason relates to the way ISDA Master Agreements are closed out inder Section 6(e):
{box|Template:Isdaq}}
- On a close-out, each Transaction is terminated, the individual close-out amounts are determined, they’re aggregated up to a single net sum (i.e. negative exposures are netted off against positive ones) and the single Early Termination Payment is payable under 6(e) (Payments on Early Termination) of the ISDA Master Agreement.
- That is to say, it is *not* payable under the Transaction at all - it's payable under the ISDA Master Agreement itself.
- Therefore, if the guarantee relates to the single Transaction only, at precisely the point you wish to rely on it (i.e., upon the party’s default), it will vanish. Same goes for Letters of Credit.