Performative governance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}{{quote|“''I define performative governance as the | {{a|devil|}}{{quote|“''I define performative governance as the state’s theatrical deployment of visual, verbal, and gestural symbols to foster an impression of good governance before an audience of citizens''” | ||
:—Iza Ding<ref>''World Politics'', [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/abs/performative-governance/AAC558378BEA651DB7E2480ECFFB4E10 Vol 72, Issue 4, October 2020, pp. 525 - 556. ] “Performative governance should be distinguished from other types of state behavior, such as inertia, paternalism, and the substantive satisfaction of citizens’ demands.”</ref>}} | :—Iza Ding<ref>''World Politics'', [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/abs/performative-governance/AAC558378BEA651DB7E2480ECFFB4E10 Vol 72, Issue 4, October 2020, pp. 525 - 556. ] “Performative governance should be distinguished from other types of state behavior, such as inertia, paternalism, and the substantive satisfaction of citizens’ demands.”</ref>}} | ||
Just as well this kind of thing could never happen in a corporate environment. | |||
“Performative” is a voguish word, and if the learned author thinks she’s discovered something new — that administrators manage [[second-order derivatives]] and proxies of their political problems rather than engaging in the political problems themselves, she would do herself a favour by reading {{author|James C. Scott}} or {{author|Jane Jacobs}} — these ideas have been around for seventy or more years — but ''since'' its fashionable, and since it is bang-on the money, let”s go with it. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{br|Seeing Like a State}} | |||
*[[Box-ticking]] | *[[Box-ticking]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 12:08, 27 February 2021
|
“I define performative governance as the state’s theatrical deployment of visual, verbal, and gestural symbols to foster an impression of good governance before an audience of citizens”
- —Iza Ding[1]
Just as well this kind of thing could never happen in a corporate environment.
“Performative” is a voguish word, and if the learned author thinks she’s discovered something new — that administrators manage second-order derivatives and proxies of their political problems rather than engaging in the political problems themselves, she would do herself a favour by reading James C. Scott or Jane Jacobs — these ideas have been around for seventy or more years — but since its fashionable, and since it is bang-on the money, let”s go with it.
See also
References
- ↑ World Politics, Vol 72, Issue 4, October 2020, pp. 525 - 556. “Performative governance should be distinguished from other types of state behavior, such as inertia, paternalism, and the substantive satisfaction of citizens’ demands.”