Critical theory: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|philosophy|[[File:Snowflake.jpg|450px|frameless|center]]}}{{d|Critical theory|/ˈkrɪtɪkəl/ /ˈθɪəri/|n|}} | {{a|philosophy|[[File:Snowflake.jpg|450px|frameless|center]]}}{{d|Critical theory|/ˈkrɪtɪkəl/ /ˈθɪəri/|n|}}<br> | ||
(''Sociology'') A catch-all phrase designed to pin down an intellectual movement which, above all other priorities, as a horror of being ''pinned down'', since what can be pinned down can be analysed and | (''Sociology'') A catch-all phrase designed to pin down an intellectual movement which, above all other priorities, as a horror of being ''pinned down'', since what can be pinned down can be analysed, exposed and — well — ''criticised''. [[Critical theory]], in this context, is allegedly “third-wave” [[post-modernism]]: (originally race, law or gender but now has forked into whatever happens to be the ''cause célébre'' du jour); social justice theory; [[woke]]ness; general [[snowflake]]ry. | ||
To be clear: the [[JC]] lines up with the [[libtard]]s here: the optimal society is a pluralistic, tolerant one, maximally permissive of the non-aggressive interests of those at the margins and which, all other things being equal, defends those interests in cases of conflict with the majority. | To be clear: the [[JC]] lines up with the [[libtard]]s here: the optimal society is a pluralistic, tolerant one, maximally permissive of the non-aggressive interests of those at the margins and which, all other things being equal, defends those interests in cases of conflict with the majority. |
Revision as of 09:19, 12 April 2021
Philosophy
|
Critical theory
/ˈkrɪtɪkəl/ /ˈθɪəri/ (n.)
(Sociology) A catch-all phrase designed to pin down an intellectual movement which, above all other priorities, as a horror of being pinned down, since what can be pinned down can be analysed, exposed and — well — criticised. Critical theory, in this context, is allegedly “third-wave” post-modernism: (originally race, law or gender but now has forked into whatever happens to be the cause célébre du jour); social justice theory; wokeness; general snowflakery.
To be clear: the JC lines up with the libtards here: the optimal society is a pluralistic, tolerant one, maximally permissive of the non-aggressive interests of those at the margins and which, all other things being equal, defends those interests in cases of conflict with the majority.
But this isn’t to say there aren’t thoroughly unscrupulous people doing thoroughly unscrupulous things in the name of social justice.