Why your job is safe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]}}An occasional running series. | {{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]] | ||
[[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]] | |||
}}An occasional running series. | |||
Your job is safe as long as: | Your job is safe as long as: |
Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2021
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
An occasional running series.
Your job is safe as long as:
- Google thinks that ==> is a sensible win prediction for a cricket match.
- Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”.
- Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”.
- Long term, technology is a leveller and not a provider of competitive advantage