Why your job is safe: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]}}An occasional running series.
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]]
[[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]
}}An occasional running series.


Your job is safe as long as:
Your job is safe as long as:

Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2021

JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago
A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

An occasional running series.

Your job is safe as long as:

  • Google thinks that ==> is a sensible win prediction for a cricket match.
  • Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”.
  • Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”.
  • Long term, technology is a leveller and not a provider of competitive advantage

See also