Dotted line: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|office|}}It is a curious fact that the further up the multi-level marketing pyramid— sorry, I mean ''org chart'' — you go, and as the practical utility of line man..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|office|}}It is a curious fact that the further up the multi-level marketing pyramid— sorry, I mean ''[[org chart]]'' — you go, and as the practical utility of line management dwindles to zero,<ref>AN impassioned essay about that [[reduction in force|here]].</ref> so too increases your likelihood of having ''multiple'' line managers: usually one is designated the proper one, and the others simply “dotted” reporting lines, but organisations with a taste for the byzantine my introduce bi-modal coverage matrices say — by division and region — meaning the same person can be reporting fully to two people at once. And of course there is that old ''investment-bank-as--the-cruel-jungle'' staple, the co-heads of a business, where lucky support staff report to a two-headed credit-claiming, and responsibility-ducking hydra, rather than a single individual.
{{a|work|}}It is a curious fact that the further up the multi-level marketing pyramid— sorry, I mean ''[[org chart]]'' — you go, and as the practical utility of line management dwindles to zero,<ref>AN impassioned essay about that [[reduction in force|here]].</ref> so too increases your likelihood of having ''multiple'' line managers: usually one is designated the proper one, and the others simply “dotted” reporting lines, but organisations with a taste for the byzantine my introduce bi-modal coverage matrices say — by division and region — meaning the same person can be reporting fully to two people at once. And of course there is that old ''investment-bank-as--the-cruel-jungle'' staple, the co-heads of a business, where lucky support staff report to a two-headed credit-claiming, and responsibility-ducking hydra, rather than a single individual.


In any case, having two managers is like running two diaries, or keeping two golden sources of the same data. A recipe for confusion, resentment, misunderstanding and, {{shitfan}}
In any case, having two managers is like running two diaries, or keeping two golden sources of the same data. A recipe for confusion, resentment, misunderstanding and, {{shitfan}}

Revision as of 12:43, 19 November 2021

Office anthropology™
The JC puts on his pith-helmet, grabs his butterfly net and a rucksack full of marmalade sandwiches, and heads into the concrete jungleIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

It is a curious fact that the further up the multi-level marketing pyramid— sorry, I mean org chart — you go, and as the practical utility of line management dwindles to zero,[1] so too increases your likelihood of having multiple line managers: usually one is designated the proper one, and the others simply “dotted” reporting lines, but organisations with a taste for the byzantine my introduce bi-modal coverage matrices say — by division and region — meaning the same person can be reporting fully to two people at once. And of course there is that old investment-bank-as--the-cruel-jungle staple, the co-heads of a business, where lucky support staff report to a two-headed credit-claiming, and responsibility-ducking hydra, rather than a single individual.

In any case, having two managers is like running two diaries, or keeping two golden sources of the same data. A recipe for confusion, resentment, misunderstanding and, quand l’ordure se frappe le ventilateur

See also

  1. AN impassioned essay about that here.