Client communication: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|
{{a|devil|[[File:Polite notice.png|450px|frameless|center]]}}
When engaged in the tiresome business of one-way customer communications, bear a few things in mind. This applies whether you are a law firm writing [[Client alert|client bulletins]] (or for presenting [[Law firm seminar|seminars]]), or a [[client outreach]] team designing mass-mailshots to comply with financial services regulation.


[[File:Polite notice.png|450px|frameless|center]]}}When engaged in the tiresome business of one-way client communications, bear a few things in mind.
=== Client communications are some kind of damage limitation exercise===
Even if they are not, specifically, a damage-limitation exercise, if you are writing to all of your customers at once, your news is either outright bad — you’ve screwed something up — or [[tedious|''tedious'']] — regulations have changed and there is some stuff you need to know — or ''annoying'' — there is something we forgot to tell you, or we need to ask you to do.


===Client communications are some kind of damage limitation exercise===
In most cases, if your customers care at ''all'' about your letter, they will care a lot less about it than you do. No-one sends out client comms for the hell of it: usually they will be instigated by a regulator or your [[compliance]] team, and in neither case will your customers be very interested in them. Perhaps they ''should'' be, but they ''won’t'' be.  
Even if they are not, specifically, a damage-limitation exercise, if you are writing to all of your clients at once, the news is either outright bad — you’ve screwed something up — or just tedious — regulations have changed and there is some stuff you need to know.


In most cases, if your clients care at ''all'' about your letter, they will care a lot less about it than you do. No one sends out client comms for the hell of it: usually they will be instigated by your regulator or your compliance department, and in neither case will your client be very interested in them. Perhaps they ''should'' be, but they won’t be.  
Since your tidings will be somewhere between irrelevant and exasperating, assume your readers, being human, will react by ignoring them, being confused by them, being irritated by them, or being confused ''and'' irritated by, and therefore ignoring, them.


Since your tidings will be somewhere between irrelevant and annoying, assume your readers, being human, will react by ignoring it, being confused by it, being irritated by it, or being confused ''and'' irritated by it, and therefore ignoring it.
Your job is to  minimise the risk of your customers’ confusion, irritation, and inattention. Here are some rules to help you.


Since you don’t want them to be confused or irritated or to ignore the letter take care about how you phrase it.
==Rule 1: be brief==
It ought to go without saying, but it is a truism the modern professional seems unable to grasp: ''keep it short''. Do not use two words when one will do. Do not use one word when ''none'' will do. Writing to customers is like flying on the cheapest budget airline in the world, your words are your luggage.  


==Rules 1: Be brief==
====Sub-rule: get to the point====  
It ought to go without saying, but it is a truism the modern professional seems unable to take to heart: be brief. Do not use two words when one will do. Imagine you are flying on the cheapest budget airline in the world, and the words are luggage.
Presume that if a customer starts reading at all, it will stop reading far more quickly than you would. If you expect your client to do something, state it clearly, plainly and above all early in the communication.
 
===Subrule: Get to the point===  
Presume that if a client starts reading at all, it will stop reading far more quickly than you would. If you expect your client to do something, state it clearly, plainly and above all early in the communication.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Don’t say !! Do say
! Don’t say !!Do say
{{aligntop}}
{{aligntop}}
| style="width: 50%" |
| style="width: 50%" |
Line 26: Line 25:
| style="width: 50%" | From 1 July, you must provide us with newly issued WHT certificates before the dividend record date.  
| style="width: 50%" | From 1 July, you must provide us with newly issued WHT certificates before the dividend record date.  
|}
|}
===Sub-rule: don’t show your working===
====Sub-rule: don’t show your working====
Your subject matter experts will understand all the details, and will barely be able to resist regurgitating them all over your letter. ''Don’t''. Say what you need to say, as clearly as you can so that a non-specialist will grasp is straight away, and no more.
Your subject matter experts will understand all the details, and will barely be able to resist regurgitating them all over your letter. ''Don’t''. Say what you need to say, as clearly as you can so that a non-specialist will grasp is straight away, and no more.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Don’t say !! Do say
!Don’t say!! Do say
{{aligntop}}
{{aligntop}}
| style="width: 50%" |The Upper House of the German Parliament on 28 May 2021 approved the bill pertaining to the modernisation of withholding tax relief procedures (“'''AbzStEntModG'''”; ''Abzugsteuerentlastungsmodernisierungsgesetz''), parts of which are due to enter into force on 1 July  2021, especially amendments to the German Investment Tax Act. The bill foresees a change in terms of the relief at source procedure applicable to income payments subject to German withholding tax (for example dividend and taxable interest payments) paid to a foreign investment fund (“''beschränkt körperschaftsteuerpflichtiger Investmentfonds''”). In this context, newly issued fund status certificates will contain information on the corporation tax status (“''Körperschaftsteuerstatus''”) of the certified investment fund. Current valid certificates that are already submitted, however, will stay valid according to a letter issued by the Ministry of Finance on 1 June  2021 (BMF – reference GZ: IV C 1 - S 1980-1/19/10027 :006 DOK: 2021/0577184).
| style="width: 50%" |The Upper House of the German Parliament on 28 May 2021 approved the bill pertaining to the modernisation of withholding tax relief procedures (“'''AbzStEntModG'''”; ''Abzugsteuerentlastungsmodernisierungsgesetz''), parts of which are due to enter into force on 1 July  2021, especially amendments to the German Investment Tax Act. The bill foresees a change in terms of the relief at source procedure applicable to income payments subject to German withholding tax (for example dividend and taxable interest payments) paid to a foreign investment fund (“''beschränkt körperschaftsteuerpflichtiger Investmentfonds''”). In this context, newly issued fund status certificates will contain information on the corporation tax status (“''Körperschaftsteuerstatus''”) of the certified investment fund. Current valid certificates that are already submitted, however, will stay valid according to a letter issued by the Ministry of Finance on 1 June  2021 (BMF – reference GZ: IV C 1 - S 1980-1/19/10027 :006 DOK: 2021/0577184).
Line 36: Line 35:
|}
|}


===Sub-rule: Don’t track regulatory language===
==== Sub-rule: don’t track regulatory language====
It is highly fashionable among legal eagles to “track the language of the legislation” in client communications. This ensures utmost fidelity with compliance, and guarantees one cannot be blamed. ''these are supremely poor motivations to have when writing a client communication. They are lazy, timid and
It is highly fashionable among [[Legal eagle|legal eagles]] to “track the language of the legislation” in client communications. This ensures utmost fidelity with the rules. It ensures a writer cannot be blamed for getting it wrong. This is  ''lazy''. It is ''timid''. It ''rejects responsibility'' and puts it on the customer.  It converts ''your'' regulatory problem  into your customer’s. Your job is to to make your customer’s life easier, not harder. You are meant to internalise the ugliness of your regulatory environment, not to lay it on your client. It is not your client’s problem. It most likely meant to be for your client’s benefit. So: speak only in terms of consequences, and action. Where this points back to regulation, summarise. Extract. Contextualise. Put this in a format the customer can understand and relate to. Be a pr


==Rule 2: Be clear==
==Rule 2: be clear==
=== Subrule: State consequences===
==== Sub-rule: State consequences====
Be clear what will happen if the client doesn’t reply. Don’t be judgmental; just matter of fact.
Be clear what will happen if the customer doesn’t reply. Don’t be judgmental; just matter of fact.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Don’t say !! Do say
! Don’t say !!Do say
{{aligntop}}
{{aligntop}}
| style="width: 50%" |In accordance with the above-mentioned bill, any application for the reversal of overpaid tax, via presentation of a fund status certificate with retroactive validity, will no longer be possible via the Bank. Instead, the reclaim must be addressed directly to the Federal Central Tax Office (Bundeszentralamt für Steuern; BZSt). Consequently, as of 1 July 2021 customers providing a fund status certificate for a foreign investment fund after the payment date of the taxable income event cannot be refunded. Full tax must be withheld. The Bank will in turn issue a tax voucher upon customer request.
| style="width: 50%" |In accordance with the above-mentioned bill, any application for the reversal of overpaid tax, via presentation of a fund status certificate with retroactive validity, will no longer be possible via the Bank. Instead, the reclaim must be addressed directly to the Federal Central Tax Office (Bundeszentralamt für Steuern; BZSt). Consequently, as of 1 July 2021 customers providing a fund status certificate for a foreign investment fund after the payment date of the taxable income event cannot be refunded. Full tax must be withheld. The Bank will in turn issue a tax voucher upon customer request.
| style="width: 50%" | If you do not, you must file your WHT reclaim directly with the German tax authority.  
| style="width: 50%" | If you do not, you must file your WHT reclaim directly with the German tax authority.  
|}
|}
==Rule 3: Be persuasive===
==Rule 3: be [[Persuasion|persuasive]]==
To the extent following rules 1 and 2 don’t get you there, remember you are writing with the idea of not just discharging some regulatory obligation to your client — that’s a second order objective — but to make your client think well of you. Frame your letter to appeal to your correspondents, so they are more likely to read it.
To the extent following rules 1 and 2 don’t get you there, remember you are writing with the idea of not just discharging some regulatory obligation to your customer — that’s a second order objective — but to make your customer think well of you. Frame your letter to appeal to your correspondents, so they are more likely to read it.
 
Remember {{author|Robert Cialdini}}’s six rules of [[persuasion]]. Deploy them where you can.
 
====Sub-rule: be personal ====
Personalise it. don’t say “[[Dear Client]]” — don’t ''ever'' do that — but address an individual by name, and send from an individual, by name.  


===Subrule: be personal===
Yes, it is a mass mailshot to every customer in the book. But we are in 2021, friends. It is not beyond the wit of technology, anymore to ''use a freaking mail merge''.<ref>You thought I was going to say “use [[neural network]]<nowiki/>s to guess customer names” didn’t you?</ref> What’s stopping you? Oh, crappy client static data? ''Fix your damn client static data''. If your salespeople aren’t keeping it up to date, ''they’re not doing their jobs''. Either have good client static data, and use it to demonstrate you care enough about your customer to be justified in calling them “dear”  — or don’t, accept your customers to you are a passive herd of cattle there only to be milked, and don’t try to be ingratiating while you do it.
Personalise it. don’t say “[[Dear Client]]” — don’t ''ever'' do that — but address it to an individual by name, and send it from an individual, by name. Yes, I know it is a mass mailshot to every client in the book. But we are in 2021, friends. It is not beyond the wit of technology, anymore to ''use a freaking mail merge''. (you thought I was going to say “use neural networks to guess client names” didn’t you?). What’s stopping you? Oh, crappy client static data? ''Fix your damn client static data''. If your salesguys aren’t keeping it up to date, ''they’re not doing their jobs''. Either have good client static data, and use it to demonstrate you care enough about your client to be justified in calling them “dear”  — or don’t, accept your clients to you are a passive herd of cattle there only to be milked, and don’t try to be ingratiating while you do it.


''Don’t say “please be advised”''. ''Ever''. Just don’t do it. These are your valuable clients, not truculent secondary school children plotting to burn down the staff room.  
''Don’t say “please be advised”''. ''Ever''. Just don’t do it. These are your valuable customers, not truculent secondary school children plotting to burn down the staff room.  
===Subrule: be emphatic===
====Sub-rule: be emphatic====
say what you mean with strong, active, assertive nouns and verbs. Don’t use weasle words.  Avoid “seems to”, “appears to be”, “slightly”, “almost”, “practically”, “virtually”.  
say what you mean with strong, active, assertive nouns and verbs. Don’t use weasle words.  Avoid “seems to”, “appears to be”, “slightly”, “almost”, “practically”, “virtually”.  
===Subrule: Don’t use disclaimers===
====Sub-rule: avoid disclaimers====
Think first “what will my client think of ''me'' if I say that”, rather than “what if I get it wrong and my client sues me?” You are a professional. You are good at what you do. Trust yourself not to get it wrong. Disclaimers are like [[airbags]]. [[You only need airbags if you don’t steer straight]]. Concentrate on defensive driving, not crash mats. If you ''have'' to have a disclaimer — and I know, you ''will'' have to have one — keep it brief, to the point and put it at the end. If the first thing your client reads is “[[Please be advised]] we take no responsibility for this, we are only doing this because someone said we have to, so on your own head be it”, your client is going to think, “gee, what a douche”. Generally, that’s not how you want your client to be thinking now, is it?
Think first “what will my customer think of ''me'' if I say that”, rather than “what if I get it wrong and my customer sues me?” You are a professional. You are good at what you do. Trust yourself not to get it wrong. Disclaimers are like [[airbags]]. [[You only need airbags if you don’t steer straight]]. Concentrate on defensive driving, not crash mats. If you ''have'' to have a disclaimer — and I know, you ''will'' have to have one — keep it brief, to the point and put it at the end. If the first thing your customer reads is “[[Please be advised]] we take no responsibility for this, we are only doing this because someone said we have to, so on your own head be it”, your customer is going to think, “gee, what a douche”. Generally, that’s not how you want your customer to be thinking now, is it?

Revision as of 15:11, 7 December 2021

File:Polite notice.png
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


When engaged in the tiresome business of one-way customer communications, bear a few things in mind. This applies whether you are a law firm writing client bulletins (or for presenting seminars), or a client outreach team designing mass-mailshots to comply with financial services regulation.

Client communications are some kind of damage limitation exercise

Even if they are not, specifically, a damage-limitation exercise, if you are writing to all of your customers at once, your news is either outright bad — you’ve screwed something up — or tedious — regulations have changed and there is some stuff you need to know — or annoying — there is something we forgot to tell you, or we need to ask you to do.

In most cases, if your customers care at all about your letter, they will care a lot less about it than you do. No-one sends out client comms for the hell of it: usually they will be instigated by a regulator or your compliance team, and in neither case will your customers be very interested in them. Perhaps they should be, but they won’t be.

Since your tidings will be somewhere between irrelevant and exasperating, assume your readers, being human, will react by ignoring them, being confused by them, being irritated by them, or being confused and irritated by, and therefore ignoring, them.

Your job is to minimise the risk of your customers’ confusion, irritation, and inattention. Here are some rules to help you.

Rule 1: be brief

It ought to go without saying, but it is a truism the modern professional seems unable to grasp: keep it short. Do not use two words when one will do. Do not use one word when none will do. Writing to customers is like flying on the cheapest budget airline in the world, your words are your luggage.

Sub-rule: get to the point

Presume that if a customer starts reading at all, it will stop reading far more quickly than you would. If you expect your client to do something, state it clearly, plainly and above all early in the communication.

Don’t say Do say

The original fund status certificate needs to be in place at the Bank before the taxable income event is due to be paid. To avoid delay of certificate recording, customers are reminded to send the fund status certificates to the Bank.

From 1 July, you must provide us with newly issued WHT certificates before the dividend record date.

Sub-rule: don’t show your working

Your subject matter experts will understand all the details, and will barely be able to resist regurgitating them all over your letter. Don’t. Say what you need to say, as clearly as you can so that a non-specialist will grasp is straight away, and no more.

Don’t say Do say
The Upper House of the German Parliament on 28 May 2021 approved the bill pertaining to the modernisation of withholding tax relief procedures (“AbzStEntModG”; Abzugsteuerentlastungsmodernisierungsgesetz), parts of which are due to enter into force on 1 July 2021, especially amendments to the German Investment Tax Act. The bill foresees a change in terms of the relief at source procedure applicable to income payments subject to German withholding tax (for example dividend and taxable interest payments) paid to a foreign investment fund (“beschränkt körperschaftsteuerpflichtiger Investmentfonds”). In this context, newly issued fund status certificates will contain information on the corporation tax status (“Körperschaftsteuerstatus”) of the certified investment fund. Current valid certificates that are already submitted, however, will stay valid according to a letter issued by the Ministry of Finance on 1 June 2021 (BMF – reference GZ: IV C 1 - S 1980-1/19/10027 :006 DOK: 2021/0577184). On 1 July, Germany changed its rules for claiming withholding tax relief on dividend income. These changes affect non-resident investment funds.

Sub-rule: don’t track regulatory language

It is highly fashionable among legal eagles to “track the language of the legislation” in client communications. This ensures utmost fidelity with the rules. It ensures a writer cannot be blamed for getting it wrong. This is lazy. It is timid. It rejects responsibility and puts it on the customer. It converts your regulatory problem into your customer’s. Your job is to to make your customer’s life easier, not harder. You are meant to internalise the ugliness of your regulatory environment, not to lay it on your client. It is not your client’s problem. It most likely meant to be for your client’s benefit. So: speak only in terms of consequences, and action. Where this points back to regulation, summarise. Extract. Contextualise. Put this in a format the customer can understand and relate to. Be a pr

Rule 2: be clear

Sub-rule: State consequences

Be clear what will happen if the customer doesn’t reply. Don’t be judgmental; just matter of fact.

Don’t say Do say
In accordance with the above-mentioned bill, any application for the reversal of overpaid tax, via presentation of a fund status certificate with retroactive validity, will no longer be possible via the Bank. Instead, the reclaim must be addressed directly to the Federal Central Tax Office (Bundeszentralamt für Steuern; BZSt). Consequently, as of 1 July 2021 customers providing a fund status certificate for a foreign investment fund after the payment date of the taxable income event cannot be refunded. Full tax must be withheld. The Bank will in turn issue a tax voucher upon customer request. If you do not, you must file your WHT reclaim directly with the German tax authority.

Rule 3: be persuasive

To the extent following rules 1 and 2 don’t get you there, remember you are writing with the idea of not just discharging some regulatory obligation to your customer — that’s a second order objective — but to make your customer think well of you. Frame your letter to appeal to your correspondents, so they are more likely to read it.

Remember Robert Cialdini’s six rules of persuasion. Deploy them where you can.

Sub-rule: be personal

Personalise it. don’t say “Dear Client” — don’t ever do that — but address an individual by name, and send from an individual, by name.

Yes, it is a mass mailshot to every customer in the book. But we are in 2021, friends. It is not beyond the wit of technology, anymore to use a freaking mail merge.[1] What’s stopping you? Oh, crappy client static data? Fix your damn client static data. If your salespeople aren’t keeping it up to date, they’re not doing their jobs. Either have good client static data, and use it to demonstrate you care enough about your customer to be justified in calling them “dear” — or don’t, accept your customers to you are a passive herd of cattle there only to be milked, and don’t try to be ingratiating while you do it.

Don’t say “please be advised”. Ever. Just don’t do it. These are your valuable customers, not truculent secondary school children plotting to burn down the staff room.

Sub-rule: be emphatic

say what you mean with strong, active, assertive nouns and verbs. Don’t use weasle words. Avoid “seems to”, “appears to be”, “slightly”, “almost”, “practically”, “virtually”.

Sub-rule: avoid disclaimers

Think first “what will my customer think of me if I say that”, rather than “what if I get it wrong and my customer sues me?” You are a professional. You are good at what you do. Trust yourself not to get it wrong. Disclaimers are like airbags. You only need airbags if you don’t steer straight. Concentrate on defensive driving, not crash mats. If you have to have a disclaimer — and I know, you will have to have one — keep it brief, to the point and put it at the end. If the first thing your customer reads is “Please be advised we take no responsibility for this, we are only doing this because someone said we have to, so on your own head be it”, your customer is going to think, “gee, what a douche”. Generally, that’s not how you want your customer to be thinking now, is it?

  1. You thought I was going to say “use neural networks to guess customer names” didn’t you?