Template:M summ OSLA 15: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "What on earth, you might muse, is a “course of dealings”? According to [http://www.businessdictionary.com BusinessDictionary.com], it is “a pattern of normal business co...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{course of dealings capsule}} | |||
In any weather, it adds nothing but heft to this clause. This is a standard termination on notice clause for the {{osla}} itself, but doesn’t cut across the terms — and in particular, any stipulated ''[[term]]'' for any loan, which will be set out in a {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}<ref>Curiously, the [[OSLA]] doesn’t define a “{{oslaprov|loan}}” as such, but rather refers to the terms, accepted by the {{oslaprov|Lender}}, of a {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}. This is [[The farmer and the sheep|counting-sheep-legs-and-dividing-by-four]] behaviour, [[calculated]] to discombobulate non-specialists and keep them away.</ref> They made a much better fist of it in the {{tag|GMSLA}}. | In any weather, it adds nothing but heft to this clause. This is a standard termination on notice clause for the {{osla}} itself, but doesn’t cut across the terms — and in particular, any stipulated ''[[term]]'' for any loan, which will be set out in a {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}<ref>Curiously, the [[OSLA]] doesn’t define a “{{oslaprov|loan}}” as such, but rather refers to the terms, accepted by the {{oslaprov|Lender}}, of a {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}. This is [[The farmer and the sheep|counting-sheep-legs-and-dividing-by-four]] behaviour, [[calculated]] to discombobulate non-specialists and keep them away.</ref> They made a much better fist of it in the {{tag|GMSLA}}. | ||
So before you can use this clause, you must validly terminate each loan under the terms of its {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}. | So before you can use this clause, you must validly terminate each loan under the terms of its {{oslaprov|Borrowing Request}}. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:25, 7 January 2022
What on earth, you might muse, is a “course of dealing”? According to BusinessDictionary.com, it is “a pattern of normal business conduct between two parties. It is established over a period involving several transactions, and may be used as a reliable indicator of how they intend to deal in the future.”
In any weather, it adds nothing but heft to this clause. This is a standard termination on notice clause for the 1995 OSLA itself, but doesn’t cut across the terms — and in particular, any stipulated term for any loan, which will be set out in a Borrowing Request[1] They made a much better fist of it in the GMSLA.
So before you can use this clause, you must validly terminate each loan under the terms of its Borrowing Request.
- ↑ Curiously, the OSLA doesn’t define a “loan” as such, but rather refers to the terms, accepted by the Lender, of a Borrowing Request. This is counting-sheep-legs-and-dividing-by-four behaviour, calculated to discombobulate non-specialists and keep them away.