Efficient language hypothesis: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|}}A bedfellow to the more famous [[efficient market hypothesis]], {{Efficient language hypothesis capsule}}
{{a|plainenglish|}}A bedfellow to the more famous [[efficient market hypothesis]], {{Efficient language hypothesis capsule}}.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Semantic code project]]
*[[Semantic code project]]

Revision as of 12:12, 26 January 2022

Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A bedfellow to the more famous efficient market hypothesis, the JC’s efficient language hypothesis states that the universally acknowledged advantages in efficiency, clarity, brevity and productivity offered by simple, clear and plain legal drafting are so compelling that sustained prolixity is impossible in commercial contracts, and all bilateral accords will eventually resolve themselves to, at most, terse bullet points rendered on a cocktail napkin, and ideally some kind of mark-up language or machine code. This, the JC goes on to conclude, must mean that the commercial world we appear to live in is just a bad dream..

See also