Adjectivisation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:
{{quote|“Subject to what [[Chip]] thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal as presented in its current form for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}
{{quote|“Subject to what [[Chip]] thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal as presented in its current form for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}


And bingo, you are set for success in the [[legal department]] of a large financial institution.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[nominalisation]]
*[[nominalisation]]

Latest revision as of 18:18, 3 February 2022

Towards more picturesque speech

This sentence is indicative of adjectivisation.
This one indicates elegant prose.

SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The lexo-crime of taking a perfectly good verb, having it identify as an adjective and then demeaning it by sticking an inferior, dull, verb — like be, make, do, give, or worst of all effect — in front of it. Dead giveaways constructions include the passive and the word “of”.

“I support this proposal”

becomes

“I am supportive of this proposal”

from where it is a short leap to:

“Subject to what Chip thinks, I would be inclined to be supportive of the proposal as presented in its current form for the time being.”

And bingo, you are set for success in the legal department of a large financial institution.

See also