Potential knowns: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|bi|{{knownbox}}}}{{d|Potential knowns|/pə(ʊ)ˈtɛnʃ(ə)l nəʊnz/|n|}}(''Reductionist baloney'')  
{{a|bi|{{knownbox}}}}{{d|Potential knowns|/pə(ʊ)ˈtɛnʃ(ə)l nəʊnz/|n|}}(''Reductionist baloney'')  


The complete set of all knowns, known or unknown, comprising the total intellectual energy of the [[semantic universe]].
The complete set of all [[knowns]], be they known, unknown or [[constructive]], comprising the total intellectual energy of the [[semantic universe]]. According to [[reductionist]] thinking, the sum total value of all knowns is 1.
 
This led some to career off down a logical oubliette in the quest to formulate axiomatic algebraic expressions of the relationship between all potential knowns, such as:
{{quote|
''A <nowiki>=</nowiki> (K-C) - (U+C''<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' <nowiki>)'' <br>
Where:<br>A <nowiki>=</nowiki> All Potential Knowns
<br>K <nowiki>=</nowiki> Actual Knowns<br>
C <nowiki>=</nowiki> Actually not known Constructive Knowns<br>
C''<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' <nowiki>=</nowiki> Actually known Constructive Unknowns}} until Goedel pointed out that the truth value of the proposition “there are a finite number of knowns in the universe” is, itself, unknow''able'', meaning therefore ''not'' a potential known, and since (on a reductionist theory) the proposition does have a truth value,


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Epistemology]]
*[[Forensic epistemology]]

Revision as of 09:18, 24 February 2022

The JC’S favourite Big Ideas™
There are six types of known.

The Rumsfeld three:

And the Jolly Contrarian three:

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Potential knowns
/pə(ʊ)ˈtɛnʃ(ə)l nəʊnz/ (n.)
(Reductionist baloney)

The complete set of all knowns, be they known, unknown or constructive, comprising the total intellectual energy of the semantic universe. According to reductionist thinking, the sum total value of all knowns is 1.

This led some to career off down a logical oubliette in the quest to formulate axiomatic algebraic expressions of the relationship between all potential knowns, such as:

A = (K-C) - (U+C' )'' <br> Where:<br>A <nowiki>= All Potential Knowns
K = Actual Knowns
C = Actually not known Constructive Knowns
C' = Actually known Constructive Unknowns

until Goedel pointed out that the truth value of the proposition “there are a finite number of knowns in the universe” is, itself, unknowable, meaning therefore not a potential known, and since (on a reductionist theory) the proposition does have a truth value,

See also