Sloth: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Here is what General Kurt Gebhard Adolf Philipp Freiherr von Hammerstein-Equord had to say about his officer class:
Here is what General Kurt Gebhard Adolf Philipp Freiherr von Hammerstein-Equord had to say about his officer class:


{{quote!
{{quote|
“The clever and hard-working should be General Staff.  <br>
“The clever and hard-working should be General Staff.  <br>
The stupid and lazy are suited to routine duties.  <br>
The stupid and lazy are suited to routine duties.  <br>

Revision as of 09:52, 29 April 2022

Reforming zeal by stealth, yesterday.
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Sloth
/sləʊθ/ (n.)

1. Laziness. A restive compulsion to find an easier way of doing anything, with an ultimate goal of doing nothing at all.
2. A mammal that, by achieving 1., seems to have done perfectly well for itself.

In the Bible, “sloth” is one of the deadly sins — it may also have been one of the Seven Dwarves, come to think of it — but in the Jolly Contrarian’s estimations, at least insofar as it translates into a sort of inverse dark energy in the direction of breaking down crappy and obtuse drafting — one of the great paragonic virtues.

Here is what General Kurt Gebhard Adolf Philipp Freiherr von Hammerstein-Equord had to say about his officer class:

“The clever and hard-working should be General Staff.
The stupid and lazy are suited to routine duties.
The clever and lazy are qualified for highest leadership.
The stupid and hard-working will always only cause damage.”

Be a leader, folks.

See also