Key non-performance indicator: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|design|{{image|Escher| | {{a|design|{{image|Escher|jpg|}}}}{{d|Key non-performance indicator|/kiː nɒn-pəˈfɔːməns ˈɪndɪkeɪtə/|n}}The light inversion of that measure of articulated fatuity, the [[key performance indicator]]. The “[[KNPI]]” measures the number of [[formal]], pointless, bureaucratic procedures in your firm that serve only to nourish the rotten fiefdoms and layers of administrative sediment that undermine its aspiration of meeting the aspiration of its (equally fatuous) mission statement. Of course, no firm in the western, eastern or for that matter southern hemisphere monitors [[key non-performance indicator]]s. | ||
=== [[Legal value]] === | |||
For [[Legal eagle|legal eagles]] — especially [[Inhouse counsel|inhouse ones]], who struggle to show their worth at the best of times, there is a serious point here: how ''do'' you demonstrate your value to the organisation, in a way that the boxwallahs of the executive suite will understand? | |||
Orthodoxy recommends [[key performance indicator]]<nowiki/>s, but these are best for counting actions and widgets and monitoring incoming and outgoing revenues: simple, formal, [[Legibility|legible]] things that translate directly into the financial statements. | |||
*Time spent on [[performance appraisal]] | |||
The legal craft is not like that. | |||
[[Legal value]], as often as not, resides in what you do ''not'' do as what you do. The classic case: which is more valuable — resolving a client dispute by flawlessly managing six months of industrial-grade litigation, going to court and winning hands down, with costs, on all fronts — or the ten-minute call you put into the client when the incident happens to talk it off the ledge, apologise for the misunderstanding, make salutary amends and preserve the ongoing relationship, therefore avoiding any litigation at all? | |||
Clearly the latter: but then: how to you manage that? What is teh key performance indicator that you could show to your management that illustrates all the trouble your legal department is ''avoiding''? | |||
Legal does not make widgets. ''[[Operations]]'' makes widgets. Any legal process you can fully [[Operationalisation|operationalise]] — [[Document assembly|contract automation]], for example — ''is no longer a legal process''. Legal is not part of the operational stack. Legal handles exceptions. It requires judgment, experience and wisdom. Legal is — okay, okay, ''should be'' — distilled magic. | |||
Here is where the key non-performance indicator comes into its own. You cannot measure the ineffable wonder that a [[legal eagle]] brings to her task. But you can, and should do is take steps to keep her slate clean: to give her the time and space so she ''can'' work her wristy magic. KNPIs can help here: they can point your [[Legal operations|legal ops]] team to low-value things they should be minimising or getting rid of. Many of these will be processes mandated in the first place by the legal ops team, so do not expect this to happen any time soon. | |||
== The JC’s suggestions for KNPIs == | |||
*Time spent on [[performance appraisal|performance appraisals]] | |||
*Time spent on conference calls | |||
*Average length and number of participants on conference calls | |||
*Time spent compiling [[management information and statistics]] (including [[KPI]]s) | *Time spent compiling [[management information and statistics]] (including [[KPI]]s) | ||
* | *Time spent per week on [[committee]] meetings | ||
* | *Time spent doing mandatory [[continuing professional development]] (personally directed self-education quite different) | ||
*Time spent on invoice approval | *Time spent on counsel management, law firm panel management | ||
*Legal invoice approval and payment | |||
*Time spent on [[Netting opinion|netting opinions]] and compliance | |||
* Number of [[KPI]]s by which a given individual is monitored — a sort of ''meta''-KNPI. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
* [[Inhouse counsel]] | |||
*[[Key performance indicator]] | *[[Key performance indicator]] | ||
*[[Modernism versus pragmatism]] | *[[Modernism versus pragmatism]] | ||
Revision as of 12:02, 9 November 2022
|
The design of organisations and products
|
Key non-performance indicator
/kiː nɒn-pəˈfɔːməns ˈɪndɪkeɪtə/ (n.)
The light inversion of that measure of articulated fatuity, the key performance indicator. The “KNPI” measures the number of formal, pointless, bureaucratic procedures in your firm that serve only to nourish the rotten fiefdoms and layers of administrative sediment that undermine its aspiration of meeting the aspiration of its (equally fatuous) mission statement. Of course, no firm in the western, eastern or for that matter southern hemisphere monitors key non-performance indicators.
Legal value
For legal eagles — especially inhouse ones, who struggle to show their worth at the best of times, there is a serious point here: how do you demonstrate your value to the organisation, in a way that the boxwallahs of the executive suite will understand?
Orthodoxy recommends key performance indicators, but these are best for counting actions and widgets and monitoring incoming and outgoing revenues: simple, formal, legible things that translate directly into the financial statements.
The legal craft is not like that.
Legal value, as often as not, resides in what you do not do as what you do. The classic case: which is more valuable — resolving a client dispute by flawlessly managing six months of industrial-grade litigation, going to court and winning hands down, with costs, on all fronts — or the ten-minute call you put into the client when the incident happens to talk it off the ledge, apologise for the misunderstanding, make salutary amends and preserve the ongoing relationship, therefore avoiding any litigation at all?
Clearly the latter: but then: how to you manage that? What is teh key performance indicator that you could show to your management that illustrates all the trouble your legal department is avoiding?
Legal does not make widgets. Operations makes widgets. Any legal process you can fully operationalise — contract automation, for example — is no longer a legal process. Legal is not part of the operational stack. Legal handles exceptions. It requires judgment, experience and wisdom. Legal is — okay, okay, should be — distilled magic.
Here is where the key non-performance indicator comes into its own. You cannot measure the ineffable wonder that a legal eagle brings to her task. But you can, and should do is take steps to keep her slate clean: to give her the time and space so she can work her wristy magic. KNPIs can help here: they can point your legal ops team to low-value things they should be minimising or getting rid of. Many of these will be processes mandated in the first place by the legal ops team, so do not expect this to happen any time soon.
The JC’s suggestions for KNPIs
- Time spent on performance appraisals
- Time spent on conference calls
- Average length and number of participants on conference calls
- Time spent compiling management information and statistics (including KPIs)
- Time spent per week on committee meetings
- Time spent doing mandatory continuing professional development (personally directed self-education quite different)
- Time spent on counsel management, law firm panel management
- Legal invoice approval and payment
- Time spent on netting opinions and compliance
- Number of KPIs by which a given individual is monitored — a sort of meta-KNPI.