Specified Indebtedness - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{manual|MI|1992|Specified Indebtedness|Definition of|Specified Indebtedness|medium}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{isda92manual|Specified Indebtedness}} |
Latest revision as of 12:04, 22 May 2023
1992 ISDA Master Agreement A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
Specified Indebtedness in all its glory
Related agreements and comparisons
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
No change to this definition between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA. This clause is only really relatable in the context of Cross Default Event of Default, of which it is a component.
Summary
See the Cross Default page which discusses Specified Indebtedness in detail — gory detail, if you are a premium subscriber — in the only context in which it appears: as the type of contract to which a Cross Default applies.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause
- Should derivatives be included as “Specified Indebtedness”?
- Would stock loans and repos count as “borrowed money”?
- What about initial margin?