Template:M comp disc EFET Allowance Annex 7.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else. | The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else. | ||
Here, for good order, is a | Here, for good order, is a {{diff|77096|77095}} between {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{efetannex}} and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} under the {{emissionsannex}}. | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 28 July 2023
Functionally, the definition of Force Majeure is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a comparison: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.
The equivalent under the ISDA EU Emissions Annex is the Settlement Disruption Event — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the ISDA Master Agreement so the ’squad had to call their version something else.
Here, for good order, is a comparison between Force Majeure under the EFET Allowances Annex and Settlement Disruption Event under the ISDA EU Emissions Annex.