83,224
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''“{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}”?''': There isn’t a generic catch-all term for the underlier of an {{eqderiv}} {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. This is a pity, since “{{eqderivprov|Index}}, {{eqderivprov|Share}} or {{eqderivprov|Basket}} [[as the case may be]]” isn’t the most elegant expression in the annals of legal literature. You might have used “Instrument” or even “{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” might do. | |||
There isn’t a generic catch-all term for the underlier of an {{eqderiv}} {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. This is a pity, since “{{eqderivprov|Index}}, {{eqderivprov|Share}} or {{eqderivprov|Basket}} [[as the case may be]]” isn’t the most elegant expression in the annals of legal literature. You might have used “Instrument” or even “{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” might do. | |||
“{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” is a [[JC]]-spawned confection, and we do use it [[from time to time]], when our patience with {{icds}} and its leaden drafting becomes as shiny, thin and translucent as the seat of an old pair of suit trousers. | “{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” is a [[JC]]-spawned confection, and we do use it [[from time to time]], when our patience with {{icds}} and its leaden drafting becomes as shiny, thin and translucent as the seat of an old pair of suit trousers. |