Template:Emissions force majeure overview: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Functionally, the definitions of | Functionally, the definitions of “Force Majeure” under Clause {{efetaprov|7.1}} the [[EFET Allowances Annex|EFET Annex]] and Clause {{ietaprov|13}} of the [[IETA Master Agreement|IETA]], and “{{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}” under {{euaprov|(d)(i)(4)}} of the {{euadefs}} are the same. | ||
Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}} between IETA and EFET, and here is a {{diff||}} between EFET and ISDA. | Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}} between IETA and EFET, and here is a {{diff||}} between EFET and ISDA. | ||
The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not. The equivalent under the {{euadefs}} is called a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} because there is already a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{2002ma}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else. | The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not. The equivalent under the {{euadefs}} is called a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} because there is already a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{2002ma}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else. | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 7 September 2023
Functionally, the definitions of “Force Majeure” under Clause 7.1 the EFET Annex and Clause 13 of the IETA, and “Settlement Disruption Event” under (d)(i)(4) of the ISDA Emissions Annex are the same.
Here is a comparison between IETA and EFET, and here is a comparison between EFET and ISDA.
The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not. The equivalent under the ISDA Emissions Annex is called a Settlement Disruption Event because there is already a Force Majeure under the 2002 ISDA so the ’squad had to call their version something else.