Template:Emissions No Encumbrances comp: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}} | * “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}} | ||
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things | *“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things | ||
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{ | *“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efeta}}. | ||
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you. | Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you. | ||
''We also have a special section about {{{{{1}}}|Unauthorised Transfers}} (being ISDA Section [[Unauthorised Transfers - Emissions Annex Provision|(d)(vii)(4)]], IETA Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - IETA Provision|5.4(d)]] and EFET Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - EFET Allowance Provision|6.3(d)]]) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the {{{{{1}}}|No | ''We also have a special section about {{{{{1}}}|Unauthorised Transfers}} (being ISDA Section [[Unauthorised Transfers - Emissions Annex Provision|(d)(vii)(4)]], IETA Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - IETA Provision|5.4(d)]] and EFET Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - EFET Allowance Provision|6.3(d)]]) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the {{{{{1}}}|No Encumbrances Obligation}} brought about specifically by '''theft'''.'' | ||
Revision as of 11:38, 17 October 2023
The absence of encumbrances — which was a matter of concern, in the early days of the emissions trading world, while birth pangs nascent fraud still ricocheted and lapped across the carbon soup of the primordial EU Emissions Trading Scheme — is covered fulsomely, consistently — if not a little defensively — in all the emissions master trading documents.
See:
- “No Encumbrances” (para (d)(vii) in the ISDA EU Emissions Annex
- “No Encumbrances” (cl 5.3) in the IETA Master Agreement and, of all things
- “No Encumbrances” (cl 6.3) in the EFET Allowances Appendix.
Here is a comparison of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, comparison IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the comparison of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.
We also have a special section about {{{{{1}}}|Unauthorised Transfers}} (being ISDA Section (d)(vii)(4), IETA Clause 5.4(d) and EFET Clause 6.3(d)) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the {{{{{1}}}|No Encumbrances Obligation}} brought about specifically by theft.