Lucy Letby: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
====“God complex”====
====“God complex”====
Killing people is not evidence of a God complex. The basest criminal can take life. ''Bringing people back to life '' — that is evidence of a God complex.
Killing people is not evidence of a God complex. The basest criminal can take life. ''Bringing people back to life '' — that is evidence of a God complex.
====Insulin “smoking gun”====
==Evidence==
===Insulin “smoking gun”===
In two cases (Child F and Child L) lab tests indicating high levels of insulin without accompanying c-peptide, which is prime facie evidence of administered insulin (naturally occurring insulin is accompanied by c-peptides; artificially administered insulin is not). Insulin was not prescribed for either infant.
 
If it was true that insulin was added without prescription this is evidence of actual human agency in these two episodes.
 
The defence team accepted the prosecution’s claim that insulin was added to parenteral nutrition bags and it was presented to the court as an agreed fact.<ref>{{plainlink|https://www.scienceontrial.com/post/criminal-justice-in-england-disagreeable-facts|Science on Trial}}</ref>
 
*'''The test in question was not reliable for factitious insulin'''. From the label:
{{quote|
“Please note that the insulin assay performed at RLUH is not suitable for the investigation of factitious hypoglycaemia.  If exogenous insulin administration is suspected as the cause of hypoglycaemia, please inform the laboratory so that the sample can be referred externally for analysis.”}}
*'''The test results
*'''The insulin tests were not noticed until 2018'''


====Texas sharpshooter====
====Texas sharpshooter====
Line 23: Line 35:


==Resources==
==Resources==
====Online====
*{{plainlink|https://wayback-api.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/20/lucy-letby-was-found-guilty-of-killing-seven-babies-did-she-do-it|''That'' New Yorker Article}} (choose your own snapshot from the Wayback Machine)
*{{plainlink|https://mephitis.co/the-lucy-letby-case-may-in-time-be-the-story-of-the-century/|Mephitis - The Lucy Letby Case May In Time Be The Story Of The Century}}
*{{plainlink|https://mephitis.co/the-lucy-letby-case-may-in-time-be-the-story-of-the-century/|Mephitis - The Lucy Letby Case May In Time Be The Story Of The Century}}
*{{plainlink|https://staging.d1rk7j2m6oprqr.amplifyapp.com/|TriedbyStats}}
*{{plainlink|https://staging.d1rk7j2m6oprqr.amplifyapp.com/|TriedbyStats}}
*{{plainlink|https://wayback-api.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/20/lucy-letby-was-found-guilty-of-killing-seven-babies-did-she-do-it|''That'' New Yorker Article}} (choose your own snapshot from the Wayback Machine)
*{{plainlink|https://www.scienceontrial.com/post/criminal-justice-in-england-disagreeable-facts|The Insulin ‘Evidence’ in the Lucy Letby Trial. Criminal Justice in England: Disagreeable Facts}}
====Podcasts====
*{{plainlink|https://open.spotify.com/show/2x2kstQwsyndvK0S8OOSBZ|We need to talk about Lucy Letby}} (Peter Elston and Michael McConville podcast)
*{{plainlink|https://open.spotify.com/show/2x2kstQwsyndvK0S8OOSBZ|We need to talk about Lucy Letby}} (Peter Elston and Michael McConville podcast)
*{{plainlink|https://open.spotify.com/show/5EZDmxyDtMPeJ1laVDWuWd|The Trial of Lucy Letby}} (Daily Mail podcast)
*{{plainlink|https://open.spotify.com/show/5EZDmxyDtMPeJ1laVDWuWd|The Trial of Lucy Letby}} (Daily Mail podcast)
{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Miscarriages of justice]]
*[[Miscarriages of justice]]
{{ref}}

Revision as of 13:34, 11 June 2024

The JC Sounds Off™
Podcasts, publications and pop from your favourite crusty old sod.
Music: DangerboySupercheese

Published: The Montenegro SanctionTrundlers’ Progress

Podcasts: The dog in the night timeThe secret life of horns
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

We’ve found a witch. May we burn her?

BBC Reporter Judith Moritz (reviewing social media posts on a ostentatiously product-placed MacBook):

“Sparky, full of fun, popular — she looks like the life and soul of the party in these photos. I don't know what Britain's most prolific child killer should look. I'm pretty sure it’s not this, though.

“She comes across as — mousy; a bit normal — you can’t really marry that with the enormity of what she’s been accused of.”

This fits two profiles: either this is some cold, callous, monstrous psychopath — or a perfectly ordinary young woman. You know — a sparky, fun, popular young woman. The life and soul of the party.

What are the percentages of serial killers with history of broken homes, physical or sexual abuse, mental illness. What percentage are female

“God complex”

Killing people is not evidence of a God complex. The basest criminal can take life. Bringing people back to life — that is evidence of a God complex.

Evidence

Insulin “smoking gun”

In two cases (Child F and Child L) lab tests indicating high levels of insulin without accompanying c-peptide, which is prime facie evidence of administered insulin (naturally occurring insulin is accompanied by c-peptides; artificially administered insulin is not). Insulin was not prescribed for either infant.

If it was true that insulin was added without prescription this is evidence of actual human agency in these two episodes.

The defence team accepted the prosecution’s claim that insulin was added to parenteral nutrition bags and it was presented to the court as an agreed fact.[1]

  • The test in question was not reliable for factitious insulin. From the label:

“Please note that the insulin assay performed at RLUH is not suitable for the investigation of factitious hypoglycaemia. If exogenous insulin administration is suspected as the cause of hypoglycaemia, please inform the laboratory so that the sample can be referred externally for analysis.”

  • The test results
  • The insulin tests were not noticed until 2018

Texas sharpshooter

The victim’s families

There are unquestionable victims here: the families. If Lucy Letby wasn’t responsible then this was either an unavoidable accident, in which case, there is no closure, or there is another culpable explanation — an alternative murderer seems extremely implausible — but medical misadventure of some kind is not. Difficult

The note

Everyone seems to accept the notes are highly inclusive and of little evidential value.

“The ramblings of someone under extreme psychological pressure.”

Yet they are routinely wheeled out.

Resources

Online

Podcasts

See also

References