Template:Isda Close-out Amount comp: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In the context of a {{1992ma}} that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”. | In the context of a {{1992ma}} that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”. | ||
====Key differences ==== | |||
Well, there are some significant differences between {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} and {{isda92prov|Loss}}/{{isda92prov|Market Quotation}} under the {{1992ma}}, and we go into these in more detail in the premium section {{pjchotlink|Close-out Amount v Loss/MQ showdown}}. | |||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 9 September 2024
ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ introduced the Close-out Amount into the 2002 ISDA to correct the total trainwreck of a close-out methodology set out in the 1992 ISDA.
So the dirty secret is that there isn’t a “Close-out Amount” as such under a 1992 ISDA (or the 1987 ISDA) but, in places on this wiki, we’ll refer to one anyway, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than
“... the amount determined following early termination of a Terminated Transaction using Market Quotation or Loss (as the case may be) and the Second Method, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the First Method, under the 1992 ISDA”.
In the context of a 1992 ISDA that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”.
Key differences
Well, there are some significant differences between Close-out Amount and Loss/Market Quotation under the 1992 ISDA, and we go into these in more detail in the premium section Close-out Amount v Loss/MQ showdown.