Eligible counterparty - FCA Rulebook Term: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Either a {{cobsprov|per se eligible counterparty}}, or an {{cobsprov|elective eligible counterparty}}.
Either a {{cobsprov|per se eligible counterparty}}, or an {{cobsprov|elective eligible counterparty}}.
 
====Elective ECP===
The wild goose went thataway ==>.
The famous “{{cobsprov|elective ECP}}” categorisation:
*Many {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s are also {{cobsprov|per se eligible counterparties}} — but not all.
*Those {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s that are not {{cobsprov|per se eligible counterparties}} — i.e., that are {{cobsprov|elective ECP}}s — can only be treated as {{cobsprov|ECP}}s if ''they'' have requested this categorisation. Now one might, of course, gently put that idea in such a client’s head: nothing wrong with that. Politely suggesting an elective ECP might wish to think about requesting an upgrade is one thing — but one cannot unilaterally categorise an elective ECP as an ECP without them first requesting it.
*an “{{cobsprov|elective professional client}}” (ie one is able to be upgraded from retail to professional) cannot further request to be treated as an {{cobsprov|ECP}}.


{{cobsanatomy}}
{{cobsanatomy}}

Revision as of 09:43, 3 December 2024

FCA definition.

Either a per se eligible counterparty, or an elective eligible counterparty.

=Elective ECP

The famous “elective ECP” categorisation:

Conduct of Business

This is an article about the FCA’s conduct of business rules, known by its chapter in the FCA Sourcebook, COBS, which implement, among other things, MiFID (directive 2004/39/EC (EUR Lex) and implementing directive 2006/73/EC (EUR Lex)).