Document assembly

JC pontificates about technology An occasional series. →Go uptown Molesworth’s self-adjusting thank-you letter, the first recorded instance of document assembly in recorded history Technology Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not the lawyer-killing overwhelming disruptive tech that Darrel R Mountain thought it would be way back in 2006. Its capabilities are limited, it costs a lot (no one has figured out a sensible model for how to price it... by document? by structure? by user?) it is difficult to implement, and it really just isn’t very good.

It is specified by IT folk who don’t understand the business (legal) application, sold to (legal) users who don’t understand the technological benefits of automation, let alone the challenges sub-optimal legal language poses to that technical benefit — is there any more dispositionally Luddite a professional than a lawyer? — and is commissioned and configured by management consultants who (a) don’t understand (that is, fear) the business application, (b) don’t trust (that is, fear) the legal users; and (c) are motivated to retain control of the process and quash any instinct for flexibility or creativeness by lawyers, whom they are trying to reconceptualise as mute users of overweening technology — that is to say, users.

See also

• Reg tech