Basic Representations - ISDA Provision
2002 ISDA Master Agreement
Section 3(a) in a Nutshell™ Use at your own risk, campers!
Full text of Section 3(a)
Related agreements and comparisons
|
Content and comparisons
The Section 3(a) Basic Representations survived intact, to the last punctuation mark, between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA. They were that excellent.
Summary
An observant negotiator (is there any other kind?) handling a 1992 ISDA might wish to add a new agency rep as Section 3(a)(vi). In 2002, ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new “no-agency” rep to the 2002 ISDA, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the Basic Representations, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section 3(g).
But you don’t need a bespoke “no-agency” rep if you’re on a 2002 ISDA, if that’s what you’re wondering.
General discussion
3(a)(v) Obligations Binding
“any Credit Support Document to which it is a party”: Business at the front; party at the back.
Now given that a Credit Support Document will generally be a deed of guarantee, letter of credit or some other third party form of credit assurance from a, you know, third party to which a Party in whose favour it is provided will not be a “party” — and no, an 1995 CSA is not a Credit Support Document, however much it might sound like one[1], one might wonder what the point would be of mentioning, in this sub-section, Credit Support Documents to which a Party is party.
Well — and this might come as a surprise if you’re an ISDA ingénue; old lags won’t bat an eyelid — there isn’t much point.
But does anyone, other than the most insufferable pedant, really care? I mean why would you write a snippy wiki article about some fluffy but fundamentally harmless language unless you were a stone-cold bore?
Hang on: Why are you looking at me like that?
For details freaks
See also
References
- ↑ Of course, the 1994 NY CSA is a Credit Support Document. Because it just is.