Automation eliminates value but not risk

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 08:47, 3 August 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|devil|}} If you can automate something, you can’t monetise it. You automate, therefore, as a ''defensive'' strategy: because everyone else is automating, and if you don...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


If you can automate something, you can’t monetise it. You automate, therefore, as a defensive strategy: because everyone else is automating, and if you don’t, your unit cost is higher. But (rigorous and competently executed) automation can remove micro-risks — risks that are intrinsic/internal to the process being automated; you can iron out the inconsistencies, foibles and errors of the meatware — but not the extrinsic risks that arise from the interaction of your new automated process with the outside world. those are emergent risks, impossible to see at the level of the process (certainly when a machine is carrying out that process), but that are a function of complexity.