Wilful misconduct

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 17:18, 30 June 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|negotiation|}}A variation on the similarly ludicrous wilful default with some common law heritage: {{cite|Forder|Great Western Railway Co|1905|2KB|532 at 535}}: “I...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Negotiation Anatomy™

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A variation on the similarly ludicrous wilful default with some common law heritage:

Forder v Great Western Railway Co [1905] 2KB 532 at 535: “I am quite prepared to adopt, with one slight addition, the definition of wilfulmisconduct given by Johnson J. in Graham v. Belfast and Northern Counties Ry. Co., where he says: “Wilfulmisconduct in such a special condition means misconduct to which the will is party as contradistinguished from accident, and is far beyond any negligence, even gross or culpable negligence, and involves that a person wilfullymisconducts himself who knows and appreciates that it is wrong conduct on his part in the existing circumstances to do, or to fail or omit to do (as the case may be), a particular thing, and yet intentionally does, or fails or omits to do it, or persists in the act, failure, or omission regardless of consequences.” The addition which I would suggest is, “or acts with reckless carelessness, not caring what the results of his carelessness may be.”

See also