Objective reason - UCITS V Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 15:07, 3 February 2015 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "As at the beginning of February 2015, there was not much guidance on what an "objective reason" is for the purposes of the criteria set out in UCITS V Article 22a for the dele...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

As at the beginning of February 2015, there was not much guidance on what an "objective reason" is for the purposes of the criteria set out in UCITS V Article 22a for the delegation by a depositary of the safekeeping function to a third party.

But look at the equivalent objective reason provision in AIFMD:

UCITS Anatomy

This is an article about undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities directive (UCITS).

Resources: UCITS IV (2009/65/EC (EUR Lex)) | UCITS V (2014/91/EU (EUR Lex)) | ESMA Guidance on UCITS | Depositary comparison under AIFMD and UCITS
Navigation - UCITS IV: 50(1)(g) Financial derivative instruments
Navigation - UCITS V: 22(2) Written contract with depositary | 22(3) (subscriptions, redemptions, valuation by depositary) | 22(4) (cash monitoring | 22(5) (safekeeping by depositary) | 22(7) (no reuse of assets by depositary) | 22a (delegation of depositary functions)

Anatomy™: AIFMD | CASS | COBS | Conference calls | Confis | CRR | CSA | EMIR | Equity Derivatives | FOA PCA | FUND | GMRA | GMSLA | ISDA | OSLA | PB | Swapclear | UCITS