Template:M summ 1992 ISDA Settlement Amount
Settlement Amount only applies to Transaction terminations where Market Quotation is the nominated valuation methodology. In the astoundingly unlikely circumstances[1] that there is not a Reference Market-maker on the Lord’s green planet with the time, risk tolerance or general inclination to give you, a competitor, a series of firm quotes on your portfolio that she knows you have no interest in actually hitting — let alone four of the blighters — note that this provision converts Market Quotation into, for all intents and purposes, Loss, though — and, viewers, it pains me to have to say this because it is so stupid, but I have to because it is nonetheless true — your measure of Loss is defined to include Unpaid Amounts, if you actually elected full-blown Loss in the Schedule, but it excludes Unpaid Amounts if you elected Market Quotation but wound up at Loss because you couldn’t get enough quotations Reference Market-makers to make a Market Quotation.
So if you are a true Loss person, you don't have to adjust Unpaid Amounts because they’re embedded in the definition of Loss, but if you’re a Loss-via-a-failed-Market Quotation person, you have to add/subtract Unpaid Amounts independently.
’But in any case you will wind up at the same number.
This is just some ghastly intellectual game played on we wanton boys and girls by the derivative gods.
- ↑ Not remotely unlikely. Almost certain, in fact.