The quotidian is a utility, not an asset

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 20:35, 23 February 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|devil|450px|thumb|center}}Legal eagles ''love'' the idea that standard, boilerplate, tedious terms that make up the lion’s share of com...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Legal eagles love the idea that standard, boilerplate, tedious terms that make up the lion’s share of commercial legal discourse should be regarded as a common utility; a free public resource, and not some secret sauce that keeps battalions of legal eagles in well-paid but soul-destroying work. Everyone — not just lawyers, come to think of it — likes to believe herself special, privy to something critical; dangerous; delicate — information that, should it fall into the wrong hands, may wreak great ill upon its owner or the poor unsuspecting random.

See also

{{c|Confidentiality