Template:M comp disc EUA Annex all a dream

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 15:22, 22 May 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(4)}} ---- {{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(5)}} --- {{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(iv)}}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In a Nutshell what is going on here is:

But note: no extra Cost of Carry Amount factored in here, as there is for a Suspension Event. Why? Cherchez moi. If you find out, let me know.


You will notice similarities between the way a Suspension Event and a Settlement Disruption Event. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency.

Here, in counterpoint to a normal Settlement Disruption Event if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a Cost of Carry Amount. --- Section (d)(iv), about Abandonment of Scheme, similarly, weirdly, plumps for the just a dream scenario. You would think a Forward seller, whether outright or of an option, who thought she had got those confounded Allowances off her desk, might be dismayed to find them right back on there at just the point where they became utterly valueless.

  1. Which there should be... but who knows, maybe a man from mars will come down and start eating up bars in the mean time.