Template:M tldr isda Party A and Party B

Revision as of 11:23, 16 December 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Unlike most finance contracts, the ISDA has no fixed roles — swaps were formulated as contracts between equals — the labels Party A and Party B reflect that either party can be long or short or be in- or out-of-the-money — this can create documentation glitches through clerical oversight — beyond interdealer relationships, swaps aren’t contracts between equals, but no different from other forms of financed brokerage — belief in bi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Unlike most finance contracts, the ISDA has no fixed roles — swaps were formulated as contracts between equals — the labels Party A and Party B reflect that either party can be long or short or be in- or out-of-the-money — this can create documentation glitches through clerical oversight — beyond interdealer relationships, swaps aren’t contracts between equals, but no different from other forms of financed brokerage — belief in bilaterality has led to misdirected regulation — regulation has arguably concentrated, rather than dissipated risk.