2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|eqderiv}}Ah, the ill fated [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]]. It seemed such a good idea. So advanced. So high-tech.
{{a|eqderiv|[[File:Hindenburg.jpg|450px|thumb|center|the [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]] at their launch in June 2011. As far as anyone knows, they're still there.]]}}Ah, the ill fated [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]]. It seemed such a good idea. So advanced. So high-tech, incorporating the very latest [[mark-up language]] — the much vaunted [[Financial products Markup Language]]. There are [[Linklaters]] lawyers who have not yet recovered which would be rather like having designed and piloted the [[Hindenburg]], had the [[Hindenburg]] never managed to get off the ground in the first place.


It's been six years, and no-one’s using ’em.
It’s been six years, and no-one’s using ’em.


{{Seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[Equity derivative]]s
*[[Equity derivative]]s

Revision as of 16:42, 3 December 2019

Equity Derivatives Anatomy™
the 2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions at their launch in June 2011. As far as anyone knows, they're still there.

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Ah, the ill fated 2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions. It seemed such a good idea. So advanced. So high-tech, incorporating the very latest mark-up language — the much vaunted Financial products Markup Language. There are Linklaters lawyers who have not yet recovered which would be rather like having designed and piloted the Hindenburg, had the Hindenburg never managed to get off the ground in the first place.

It’s been six years, and no-one’s using ’em.

See also