Failure by either Party to redeliver - 2000 GMSLA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
(Redirected from 9.3 - 2000 GMSLA Provision)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2000 Global Master Securities Lending Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

Index: Click to expand:Navigation (2000 GMSLA): 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | Schedule | Agency Annex | Addendum for Pooled Principal Agency Loans
Stock Lending Anatomies: GMSLA Anatomy | Pledge GMSLA Anatomy | 2000 GMSLA Anatomy | OSLA Anatomy

Clause 9.3 in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!

Full text of Clause 9.3

9.3 Failure by either Party to redeliver
This provision applies in the event that a Party (the Transferor) fails to meet a redelivery obligation within the standard settlement time for the asset concerned on the exchange or in the clearing organisation through which the asset equivalent to the asset concerned was originally delivered or within such other period as may be agreed between the Parties. In such situation, in addition to the Parties’ rights under the general law and this Agreement where the other Party (the Transferee) incurs interest, overdraft or similar costs and expenses the Transferor agrees to pay on demand and hold harmless the Transferee with respect to all such costs and expenses which arise directly from such failure excluding (i) such costs and expenses which arise from the negligence or wilful default of the Transferee and (ii) any indirect or consequential losses. It is agreed by the Parties that any costs reasonably and properly incurred by a Party arising in respect of the failure of a Party to meet its obligations under a transaction to sell or deliver securities resulting from the failure of the Transferor to fulfil its redelivery obligations is to be treated as a direct cost or expense for the purposes of this paragraph.

Related agreements and comparisons

Related agreements: Click here for the same clause in the 2010 GMSLA
Comparison: Click to [[special:diff/{{{1}}}/{{{2}}}|compare]] the 2000 GMSLA and 2010 GMSLA versions of this clause.

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Content and comparisons

Template:M comp disc 2000 GMSLA 9.3

Template

Summary

Template:M summ 2000 GMSLA 9.3

Template

See also

Template:M sa 2000 GMSLA 9.3

Template

References