Adjectivisation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


from where it is a short leap to:  
from where it is a short leap to:  
{{quote|“Subject to what Chip thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}
{{quote|“Subject to what [[Chip]] thinks, I would be [[inclined]] [[to be]] [[supportive]] [[of]] the proposal as presented in its current form for [[For the time being|the time being]].”}}


And bingo, you are set for success in the [[legal department]] of a large financial institution.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[nominalisation]]
*[[nominalisation]]

Latest revision as of 18:18, 3 February 2022

Towards more picturesque speech

This sentence is indicative of adjectivisation.
This one indicates elegant prose.

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

The lexo-crime of taking a perfectly good verb, having it identify as an adjective and then demeaning it by sticking an inferior, dull, verb — like be, make, do, give, or worst of all effect — in front of it. Dead giveaways constructions include the passive and the word “of”.

“I support this proposal”

becomes

“I am supportive of this proposal”

from where it is a short leap to:

“Subject to what Chip thinks, I would be inclined to be supportive of the proposal as presented in its current form for the time being.”

And bingo, you are set for success in the legal department of a large financial institution.

See also