Adverb: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|}}{{d|Adverb||n|}}{{quote|“Using adverbs is a mortal sin.”  
{{a|plainenglish|{{image|LA confidential|jpg|James Ellroy. No truck with adverbs.}} }}{{d|Adverb|/ˈædvɜːb/|n|}}{{quote|“Using adverbs is a mortal sin.”  
:— Elmore Leonard}}
:— Elmore Leonard}}
A word you use when you can’t think of a better [[verb]]. A good writer’s capitulation. An {{tag|adverb}} modifies a {{tag|verb}}. Most adverbs end in ~ly, but not all do: “now”, “later”, “still” “again” “moreover”, “further”, “also”, “besides”, “too” can all function as adverbs and you can of course create [[adverbial phrases]] like “on top of”, “over and above”, “into the bargain”, “by the same token” and so ''tiresomely'' (<-- also an adverb) on.
A word you use when you can’t think of a better [[verb]]. A good writer’s ''capitulation''.  


Adverbs are unwelcome in legal writing, or any literature that aspires to wit or elegance. If you find yourself resorting to an [[adverb]], always look first for a better {{tag|verb}}.
An {{tag|adverb}} ''modifies'' a {{tag|verb}}. It makes it stronger, weaker, more or less specific. Most end in ~ly, but not all do: “now”, “later”, “still” “again” “moreover”, “further”, “also”, “besides”, “too” can all function as adverbs, but note how ''redundant'' they tend to be:
 
“I will see you ''later''”; “I am ''now'' reading”; “I have some ''further'' thoughts” — they render phrases idiomatic, but add no semantic content.  
 
You can make [[adverbial phrases]], ''too'', like “on top of”, “over and above”, “into the bargain”, “by the same token” and so ''tiresomely'' (<-- also an adverb) on.
 
===Writing hack===
Therefore, a writing hack: if you are labouring with any prose passage, try removing all adverbs, and strengthening the verbs.  


“Jane '''struck the ball firmly''' through the covers and '''proceeded quickly''' to the non-striker’s end.”
“Jane '''struck the ball firmly''' through the covers and '''proceeded quickly''' to the non-striker’s end.”


“Jane '''smeared''' the ball through the covers and '''galloped''' to the non-striker’s end.”
“Jane '''spanked''' the ball through the covers and '''galloped''' to the non-striker’s end.”
 
We call this the “James Ellroy oblique strategy”: the crime writer
stumbled upon it when his editor told him to cut 100 pages from his  ''L.A. Confidential'' manuscript. Adamant that removing any characters or plot-lines would kill the story, Ellroy combed the draft nixing every adverb, most adjectives and many verbs, in the process creating a distinctive style he’s stuck with ever since.


Few sentences cannot be improved by removing [[adverb]]s.
{{Sa}}
*[[Adjective]]

Latest revision as of 15:52, 11 September 2023

Towards more picturesque speech
LA confidential.jpg
James Ellroy. No truck with adverbs.

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Adverb
/ˈædvɜːb/ (n.)

“Using adverbs is a mortal sin.”

— Elmore Leonard

A word you use when you can’t think of a better verb. A good writer’s capitulation.

An adverb modifies a verb. It makes it stronger, weaker, more or less specific. Most end in ~ly, but not all do: “now”, “later”, “still” “again” “moreover”, “further”, “also”, “besides”, “too” can all function as adverbs, but note how redundant they tend to be:

“I will see you later”; “I am now reading”; “I have some further thoughts” — they render phrases idiomatic, but add no semantic content.

You can make adverbial phrases, too, like “on top of”, “over and above”, “into the bargain”, “by the same token” and so tiresomely (<-- also an adverb) on.

Writing hack

Therefore, a writing hack: if you are labouring with any prose passage, try removing all adverbs, and strengthening the verbs.

“Jane struck the ball firmly through the covers and proceeded quickly to the non-striker’s end.”

“Jane spanked the ball through the covers and galloped to the non-striker’s end.”

We call this the “James Ellroy oblique strategy”: the crime writer stumbled upon it when his editor told him to cut 100 pages from his L.A. Confidential manuscript. Adamant that removing any characters or plot-lines would kill the story, Ellroy combed the draft nixing every adverb, most adjectives and many verbs, in the process creating a distinctive style he’s stuck with ever since.

See also