Alpha

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 14:33, 21 November 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alpha, α, is one of the Greeks - the first of the Greeks - a buzzword beloved of unimaginative derivative salespeople and second-rate hedge fund managers and hence was much abused in the run up to the great financial crash of 2008. Like many financial buzzwords, it is derived from a technical term in portfolio management theory which does mean something, though through long misuse the original, helpful meaning has mostly fallen out of use.

In a technical sense, alpha is a measure of market outperformance: it gauges the variance of a portfolio’s performance over the market average, or "beta". An investment manager’s alpha, therefore, is the value that manager adds that you would miss out on if you just invested in the benchmark.

But when you’re a salesperson, it’s easier than that. Alpha is just a catch-all buzzword meaning “really cool”, which is why it’s so popular in new product acronyms: you know, Tactically Enhanced Alpha Receipts, or TEARs, which you can be assured you’ll eventually be in if you fall for a ruse as crappy as that. Also, it’s a vowel, and you need vowels to make good acronyms.

The love-hate relationship between Alpha and Vega

All this talk of Greeks brings to mind the critical distinction between alpha, beta and vega.

Strictly speaking, the measure of alpha excludes the amplifying effects of leverage (borrowing to invest in the strategy, magnifying profits and losses of a dollar invested). Leverage increases the volatility of portfolio returns. But volatility is measured by vega, not alpha. While fund managers, particularly rubbish ones, are keen on conflating these two, they are, in fact, very different.

For one thing, it’s much easier to create vega: anyone and, indeed, everyone can: you simply introduce leverage. (Have a mortgage on your house? congratulations; you’ve generated vega).

Alpha, on the other hand, really is special, since QED only a certain portion of the market can generate it. Because it's an expression of variance from a mean, for every whizz-kid who generates positive alpha, someone’s generating an equivalent amount of negative alpha (i.e., returns than are worse than beta).

Why you should run for the hills when you see a product called leveraged alpha

Alpha was a far more credible label when hedge funds were a small segment of the market comprising the crème de la crème of the city’s trading talent — the Soroses and GLGs of the world — who really could outperform the rest of the market. If someone is incautious enough to claim they’re generating leveraged alpha, they’re either so stupid as to admit they're really just gearing the whoopsie out of your investment (if it goes wrong, guess who loses?), or they think you're so stupid you won't understand that.

Quite possibly both.

Beware of Greeks bearing leverage, therefore.

See also