Big data: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}:''Turkey'': “I have transformed myself into a data-driven business. All my data — and I've got reams of the stuff — tells me that every morning I shall be fed at 9 am precisely.  
{{a|devil|}}:''Turkey'': “I have transformed myself into a data-driven business. All my data — and I've got reams of the stuff — tells me that every morning I shall be fed at 9 am precisely.  


:Aha! Here comes the farmer, right on time! I wonder if I'll get a special treat because it is Christmas!”
:Aha! Here comes the farmer, right on time! I wonder if I’ll get a special treat because it is Christmas!”




Line 10: Line 10:
Second in its reductionism, in its funnelling of a dispersed population into an essential homogeneity, it speaks to the underlying belief in a grand unifying theory:a transcendent ''truth''. Its non-accommodation of pluralism is a denial of pluralism.
Second in its reductionism, in its funnelling of a dispersed population into an essential homogeneity, it speaks to the underlying belief in a grand unifying theory:a transcendent ''truth''. Its non-accommodation of pluralism is a denial of pluralism.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[There is no data from the future]]
*[[In God we trust, all others must bring data]]
*[[In God we trust, all others must bring data]]

Revision as of 07:53, 3 October 2020


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Turkey: “I have transformed myself into a data-driven business. All my data — and I've got reams of the stuff — tells me that every morning I shall be fed at 9 am precisely.
Aha! Here comes the farmer, right on time! I wonder if I’ll get a special treat because it is Christmas!”


The obsession with big data has two implications:

Firstly it expresses a preference for the aggregate and the mean over the outlier, the individual, the unique or extraordinary. It is to cater for the average. It is to prefer the mediocre for its weight of numbers over the genius and its isolated vision. As surely as the ugliest man killed God, so did data kill the superman. The will to power is defeated by the million-strong dull blades of the will to entropy.

Second in its reductionism, in its funnelling of a dispersed population into an essential homogeneity, it speaks to the underlying belief in a grand unifying theory:a transcendent truth. Its non-accommodation of pluralism is a denial of pluralism.

See also