Bottom up: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Advantage of bottom-up over top down: *'''Theory of human nature''': bottom-up assumes that individuals will be selfish. There is no requirement for a presumption of moral act...") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Advantage of bottom-up over top down: | {{a|devil|}}Advantage of bottom-up over top down: | ||
*'''Theory of human nature''': bottom-up assumes that individuals will be selfish. There is no requirement for a presumption of moral action. | *'''Theory of human nature''': bottom-up assumes that individuals will be selfish. There is no requirement for a presumption of moral action. | ||
*'''Complexity methodology''': a bottom-up method which iteratively allows good strategies to work rather than defining them from on high is consistent with complexity theory.<ref>{{br|The Hidden Half: How the World Conceals its Secrets}}, {{author|Michael Blastland}}, chapter 9.</ref> | *'''Complexity methodology''': a bottom-up method which iteratively allows good strategies to work rather than defining them from on high is consistent with complexity theory.<ref>{{br|The Hidden Half: How the World Conceals its Secrets}}, {{author|Michael Blastland}}, chapter 9.</ref> | ||
{{Ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 30 August 2020
|
|
Advantage of bottom-up over top down:
- Theory of human nature: bottom-up assumes that individuals will be selfish. There is no requirement for a presumption of moral action.
- Complexity methodology: a bottom-up method which iteratively allows good strategies to work rather than defining them from on high is consistent with complexity theory.[1]