Continuing professional development

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 13:27, 1 August 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The case, par excellence of the box-ticking culture than modern risk management has become.

Once upon a time, somewhere, someone in a self-regulating professional trade body confected a worry that the daily practice of one’s professional calling might render an attorney stale, out-of-touch or dangerously unlearned in the ways of her calling. A counter-intuitive idea, to be sure, but there you have it.

So was born “continuing professional development”, a stipulation whereby solicitors must periodically re-educate themselves on germane issues. It has caught on amongst other professional bodies: teachers, soldiers, healthcare professionals, accountants, architects and engineers have similarly misconceived programmes. To be sure, keeping up with your CPDs is not all that onerous — a dozen or so hours, spread over a year, is all you need — though across an entire profession that is no small demand on total capability. Law firms beheld a great marketing opportunity: a jaunty breakfast seminar for their in-house clients, followed by networking: a chance to renew acquaintances over a bagel.

Make no mistake: free bacon sandwiches are great. Most jobbing solicitors need no more incentive to show up than that. If the room is large and dark enough there is scope for a few winks. (Freshfields London has an excellently dingy auditorium, by the way, with premium snooze opportunities at the back). In brighter forums, it is a chance to catch up on Twitter, LinkedIn or follow the cricket.

But there is no practical way to ensure a CPD hour is well spent. Who can say if it is vocational, useful, relevant or whether, having signed the register, young sir spent any part of it in the room, let alone paying attention? The Americans had a crack at this by interposing a random number, to be read out at a random moment, which all candidates needed to quote in their compliance attestation to prove they were at least conscious. But even then, only one brave attorney need sit through the whole ordeal for the greater good of the whole.

Let’s pretend for a moment you do show up, and pay attention, to a topical talk for your CPD points. Will it make a difference? Will that be the thing that staves off a bout of professional negligence? No-one who has spent an hour before a wizened solicitor mumbling through a dense PowerPoint deck about the transaction reporting regime under MiFID 2 will say it does.

But hurry along - the blueberry and bran muffins are going fast.