FX Haircut Percentage - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<small>[[Template:ISDA English Law Credit Support Annex 2016 11(c)(v)|view template]]</small><br> | <small>[[Template:ISDA English Law Credit Support Annex 2016 11(c)(v)|view template]]</small><br> | ||
}} | }} | ||
An observation one might make here is that if you have a cash-only {{csa}} and as long as you only accept the Major Currencies, then this entire Rube Goldberg provision is unnecessary: The Valuation Percentage will (most likely) be 100%, the FX Haircut Percentage will be zero, so the definition of value that these definitions feed into amounts to the following: | |||
:The amount (call it ''n'') ''multiplied by'' the sum of 100% ''minus'' zero%, ''or'' | |||
:''n'' * (100% - 0%), ''or'' | |||
:''n'' * 100%, ''or'' | |||
:''n''. | |||
Sigh. |
Revision as of 17:52, 16 January 2017
An observation one might make here is that if you have a cash-only 1995 CSA and as long as you only accept the Major Currencies, then this entire Rube Goldberg provision is unnecessary: The Valuation Percentage will (most likely) be 100%, the FX Haircut Percentage will be zero, so the definition of value that these definitions feed into amounts to the following:
- The amount (call it n) multiplied by the sum of 100% minus zero%, or
- n * (100% - 0%), or
- n * 100%, or
- n.
Sigh.