Fifteenth law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Amwelladmin moved page Quantum indeterminacy to Legal quantum indeterminacy over redirect)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|cosmology|}}''Legal'' quantum indeterminacy states that “the more precisely the position of a particular negotiation is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa”.
{{a|cosmology|}}{{d|Legal quantum indeterminacy|n}}
 
A theory, proposed by [[J.W.M Biggs]] during an enjoyable closing dinner and then forgotten about for sixty years, that “the more precisely the position of a particular [[negotiation]] is determined, the ''less'' precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa”.


''[[Intranet]]'' [[quantum indeterminacy]] states that “no intranet contains any information that is both up-to-date ''and'' useful. The more useful information is, the more out of date it will be. The more current, the more pointless.”
''[[Intranet]]'' [[quantum indeterminacy]] states that “no intranet contains any information that is both up-to-date ''and'' useful. The more useful information is, the more out of date it will be. The more current, the more pointless.”

Revision as of 16:50, 8 October 2022

Financial cosmology
The JC’s guide to theoretical physics in the markets.™


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Legal quantum indeterminacy
n ({{{3}}}.)

A theory, proposed by J.W.M Biggs during an enjoyable closing dinner and then forgotten about for sixty years, that “the more precisely the position of a particular negotiation is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa”.

Intranet quantum indeterminacy states that “no intranet contains any information that is both up-to-date and useful. The more useful information is, the more out of date it will be. The more current, the more pointless.”

See also