Fifteenth law of worker entropy

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 17:18, 8 October 2022 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Financial cosmology
The JC’s guide to theoretical physics in the markets.™


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Legal quantum indeterminacy
/ˈliːgəl ˈkwɒntəm ɪn dɪˈtɜːmɪnəsi/ (n.)

The JC’s fifteenth law of worker entropy, also known as the theory of legal quantum indeterminacy, states:

“The more precisely the position of a particular negotiation is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known, and vice versa”.

The theory has a complicated genesis. Most accounts record that it was first proposed by pioneering British financial naturalist J.W.M Biggs, who invented it on the spot to defend an otherwise plainly preposterous assertion he had been backed into making in a drunken argument during an otherwise enjoyable closing dinner in Vienna in 1924.

Being somewhat the worse for wear at the time, Biggs — who could go on to discover the Biggs Hoson — claimed he then forgot about it for twenty years. Curiously, in that time Biggs appears to have not so much as mentioned the theory, and his work took him in a very different direction, employing classical lexogeometry as opposed to the relativistic frames of context required by LQI. in that time, and only being reminded of it by Otto Büchstein Biggs, by this stage an Anglican priest, was administering last rights to his the old Austrian playwright, wracked with hallucinations as he lay dying in a Burmese sanitorium in 1943. There is a theory that, in fact, Biggs had not thought of it it at all, but rather Büchstein hallucinated it out of whole cloth. Despite being coined by the latest in 1`943, it was not canoninsed as the fifteenth law of worker entropy until late 2022.

Intranet quantum indeterminacy states that “no intranet contains any information that is both up-to-date and useful. The more useful information is, the more out of date it will be. The more current, the more pointless.”

See also