Inclusive disjunction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{g}{{pe}}An inclusive disjunction is the usual use-case for the word “or”: it means “it could be this, or that, ''or both'': I’m honestly relaxed and don...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}{{pe}}An inclusive disjunction is the usual [[use-case]] for the word “[[or]]”: it means “it could be this, [[or]] that, ''or both'': I’m honestly relaxed and don’t care as long as ''at least one shows up''.” | {{g}}{{pe}}An inclusive disjunction is the usual [[use-case]] for the word “[[or]]”: it means “it could be this, [[or]] that, ''or both'': I’m honestly relaxed and don’t care as long as ''at least one shows up''.” | ||
Compare with the rarer [[exclusive disjunction]]. | Compare with the rarer [[exclusive disjunction]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:41, 24 June 2019
|
|
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
An inclusive disjunction is the usual use-case for the word “or”: it means “it could be this, or that, or both: I’m honestly relaxed and don’t care as long as at least one shows up.”
Compare with the rarer exclusive disjunction.