Increased Cost of Stock Borrow - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{eqderivanat|12.9(a)(viii)}}
{{eqderivanat|12.9(a)(viii)}}{{eqderivanat|12.9(b)(v)}}When the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} notifies an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, specifiying a proposed {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}}, the non-Hedging Party has three options:
{{eqderivanat|12.9(b)(v)}}
When the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} notifies an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, specifiying a proposed {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}}, the non-Hedging Party has three options:
*Accept the {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}} and the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} is amended accordingly;
*Accept the {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}} and the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} is amended accordingly;
*Make a one-off payment of the determined {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}}; or
*Make a one-off payment of the determined {{eqderivprov|Price Adjustment}}; or

Revision as of 14:22, 5 September 2018

Template:EqderivanatTemplate:EqderivanatWhen the Hedging Party notifies an Increased Cost of Stock Borrow, specifiying a proposed Price Adjustment, the non-Hedging Party has three options:

Only if the Non-Hedging Party has failed to give any such election by the end of the second Scheduled Trading Day can the Hedging Party terminate the Transaction. The Non-Hedging Party can lend the Hedging Party the relevant Shares in the intervening period to mitigate its loss.

Compare with Loss of Stock Borrow, where the Non-Hedging Party has a bit less flexibility in what it does: it either has to pony up (or procure) a stock borrow within 2 Scheduled Trading Days itself, or Hedging Party can terminate. Therefore Increased Cost of Stock Borrow is the "gentler" provision from the Non-Hedging Party’s perspective.

See also