Legal assignment

A word about credit risk mitigation Go Premium {{{2}}} Legal security: Mortgage • Pledge • Lien • Bailment Equitable security: Charge • fixed • floating | ABWOS | Equitable lien Credit risk mitigation: Title transfer | Guarantee | Letter of credit | Netting Friends and relations: Rehypothecation | Equivalent Documents: 1994 NY CSA | 1995 CSA | 1995 ISDA CSD (English law) Regulation: LPA 1925 | Financial Collateral Regulations | LPMPA 1994 Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Taking security Security Collateral Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

In a game of legal contract top trumps, a legal assignment marginally beats an equitable assignment, except in the “fewest formalities needed to work” category, because it must meet certain formalities set out in Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925:

• it must be absolute (unconditional).
• it must not not be by way of charge or security only: an assignment by way of security is an equitable and not a legal assignment.
• The rights assigned must be wholly ascertainable and must relate to the whole of the chose in action. This sounds meaningful and might get you 6 our of 10 in a law exam but god only knows what this means in practice.
• It must be in writing and signed - no deemed acceptance by conduct here, friend.
• The party whose obligations are being assigned must be given notice of the assignment.

but other than having a right to sue in your own name, it is hard to see the practical advantage of a legal assignment over an equitable one.

See also

• Assignment by way of security
• Chose in action