Liability (for withholding) - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|2(d)(ii)}}
{{isdaanat|2(d)(ii)}}
It is hard to peer into the fevered mind of an [[ISDA ninja]] who came up with this provision to work out just what it is meant to do, and why. The best guess comes from our old friend, the tiresome [[FT book about derivatives]], who think it addresses the time where a Payer makes a payment gross, relying in [[good faith]] on a {{isdaprov|Payee Tax Representation}} that the {{isdaprov|Payee}} is entitled to receive gross, only to then find that the tax authority in question requires the {{isdaprov|Payer}} to make that payment net after all.  In this case the Payer can require the Payee to indemnify it for the payment, interest and penalties.
This seems a stretch — the usually fulsome prose of the {{isdama}} neglects in this case to say anything about Payee Tax Representations, right or wrong, much less the Payer’s legitimate reliance on them. But on the other hand it is hard to think of a better explanation. So, go Paul C. Harding!!!

Revision as of 14:11, 19 September 2019

ISDA Anatomy™
incorporating our exclusive ISDA in a Nutshell™


In a Nutshell Section 2(d)(ii):

2(d)(ii) Liability. If the payer :—
(1) is required by law to withhold a non-Indemnifiable Tax;
(2) nonetheless does not do so; and
(3) suffers by direct assessment a liability for that Tax,
then, unless the recipient has satisfied the Tax liability directly, it must reimburse the payer for that liability (plus interest, but not penalties unless it failed to provide tax information required under Section 4(a), or breached any Payee Tax Representations.

view template

2002 ISDA full text of Section 2(d)(ii):

2(d)(ii) Liability. If:―
(1) X is required by any applicable law, as modified by the practice of any relevant governmental revenue authority, to make any deduction or withholding in respect of which X would not be required to pay an additional amount to Y under Section 2(d)(i)(4);
(2) X does not so deduct or withhold; and
(3) a liability resulting from such Tax is assessed directly against X,
then, except to the extent Y has satisfied or then satisfies the liability resulting from such Tax, Y will promptly pay to X the amount of such liability (including any related liability for interest, but including any related liability for penalties only if Y has failed to comply with or perform any agreement contained in Section 4(a)(i), 4(a)(iii) or 4(d)).

view template

Click here for the text of Section 2(d)(ii) in the 1992 ISDA


Index: Click to expand:Navigation
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

5

Events of Default
FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA
Termination Events
IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE

Early Termination 6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

6

Early Termination
ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsSet-off

Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


It is hard to peer into the fevered mind of an ISDA ninja who came up with this provision to work out just what it is meant to do, and why. The best guess comes from our old friend, the tiresome FT book about derivatives, who think it addresses the time where a Payer makes a payment gross, relying in good faith on a Payee Tax Representation that the Payee is entitled to receive gross, only to then find that the tax authority in question requires the Payer to make that payment net after all. In this case the Payer can require the Payee to indemnify it for the payment, interest and penalties.

This seems a stretch — the usually fulsome prose of the ISDA Master Agreement neglects in this case to say anything about Payee Tax Representations, right or wrong, much less the Payer’s legitimate reliance on them. But on the other hand it is hard to think of a better explanation. So, go Paul C. Harding!!!